On Tue, 04 May 2010 21:55:53 -0400, Michel Fortin
wrote:
// String version: can slice
string readUntil(isAtEndPredicate)(ref string input) {
string savedInput;
while (!input.empty && isAtEndPredicate(input.front)) {
input.p
On 2010-05-04 19:41:39 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
Anyway, just in case, would you be interested in an XML tokenizer and
simple DOM following this model?
http://michelf.com/docs/d/mfr/xmltok.html
http://michelf.com/docs/d/mfr/xml.html
At the base is a pull parser and an event p
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2010-05-04 12:09:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
By "adapt" do you mean writing a wrapper for an existing library, or
translating the source code of the library into D?
What constitutes a "generous license" in this context? (For what it's
wo
On 2010-05-04 12:09:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
By "adapt" do you mean writing a wrapper for an existing library, or
translating the source code of the library into D?
What constitutes a "generous license" in this context? (For what it's
worth, libxml2 is under
On Tue, 04 May 2010 11:56:31 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham Fawcett wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 May 2010 09:09:29 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:01:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham Fawcett wrote:
>> The fac
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2010 09:09:29 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:01:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
The fact that libxml2/libxslt support not only XML parsing and DOM
building, but also XSLT, XPath,
On Tue, 04 May 2010 09:09:29 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham Fawcett wrote:
>> On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:01:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Graham Fawcett wrote:
The fact that libxml2/libxslt support not only XML parsing and DOM
building, but also XSLT, XPath, XPoint
RapidXML also uses the Boost license (it's included as part of the Boost
PropertyTree library).
I haven't used it though, so i can't say how i compares to the others.
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:01:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Graham Fawcett wrote:
The fact that libxml2/libxslt support not only XML parsing and DOM
building, but also XSLT, XPath, XPointer, XInclude, RelaxNG, etc.,
means that any homegrown library will be hard-pressed
Hello Adam,
An important aspect of mimicing js is I don't really care about the
xml
standard; it tries to figure out whatever ugly crap you throw its way
and makes a few assumptions for html. But, it can be used for generic
xml
stuff too.
That can be handy but can also lead to problems.
--
..
On Mon, 03 May 2010 16:01:30 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham Fawcett wrote:
>> The fact that libxml2/libxslt support not only XML parsing and DOM
>> building, but also XSLT, XPath, XPointer, XInclude, RelaxNG, etc.,
>> means that any homegrown library will be hard-pressed to cover the s
On 05/03/2010 06:24 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On 04/05/10 11:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think what we need for the standard library is to take a solid XML
library licensed generously and adapt it to work with arbitrary ranges.
Andrei
Care to give an example?
I was curious about this
On 04/05/10 11:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think what we need for the standard library is to take a solid XML
library licensed generously and adapt it to work with arbitrary ranges.
Andrei
Care to give an example?
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2010 09:18:46 +1200, Bernard Helyer wrote:
When I first started using D, one of the things I needed quite early on
was a way of writing and reading XML. Naturally, when I saw std.xml in
Phobos, I was quite pleased.
That was of course, until I started to use
On Tue, 04 May 2010 09:18:46 +1200, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> When I first started using D, one of the things I needed quite early on
> was a way of writing and reading XML. Naturally, when I saw std.xml in
> Phobos, I was quite pleased.
>
> That was of course, until I started to use it.
>
> http:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:18:46AM +1200, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> I'm going to keep on using kxml regardless, but I thought it would be
> nice if Phobos had a working XML library. What say you?
I've got something almost ready to be thrown into the ring too, my
DOM lib.: http://arsdnet.net/dcode/d
When I first started using D, one of the things I needed quite early on
was a way of writing and reading XML. Naturally, when I saw std.xml in
Phobos, I was quite pleased.
That was of course, until I started to use it.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3088
http://d.puremagic.com/i
17 matches
Mail list logo
