On Friday, January 04, 2013 18:16:44 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> I think we should just introduce an "else" or "default" constraint. For
> example:
>
> void chain(Ranges...)(Ranges rs) default
> {
> static assert("std.range.chain requires: Any number of Input Ranges
> all having a common type among
I'm reposting message from Don Clugston. Somehow it's not on the list
and reply-to email address looks inaccessible.
On 02/01/13 22:25, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> The proposal is to extend template constraint from:
>
> if()
> to
> if(; )
>
> Where the is CTFE-able expression with type string.
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 23:02:12 monarch_dodra wrote:
> That said, I think another field of improvement we should
> concentrate in phobos is to have a single public entry point, and
> then privately forward to private specialized overloads.
>
> Users really shouldn't have to deal with funct
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 21:43:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, January 03, 2013 01:25:17 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
What do you think?
Hmmm. Typically the thing that you really want to know is which
portions were
true and which were false, and this doesn't help with that at
On Thursday, January 03, 2013 01:25:17 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> What do you think?
Hmmm. Typically the thing that you really want to know is which portions were
true and which were false, and this doesn't help with that at all. What it
does is make the errors more understandable for newbies, wh
The proposal is to extend template constraint from:
if()
to
if(; )
Where the is CTFE-able expression with type string.
The message-expr yields a hint string for compiler to show when
instantiation failed instead of full expression that failed. It has to
be CTFE-able even if template instant
