On 2012-03-10 00:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
P.S. Please don't overquote, you systematically do so. Thanks!
I'll try to think about that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 3/9/12 4:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:05:00 -0500, Ary Manzana
wrote:
What are you talking about?
Who are you talking to?
:)
Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no offense
for picking on you Andrej), and couple that with the newsgro
On 3/10/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I hope you realize I didn't mean it in a bad/condescending way :)
No problemo! I don't take things too seriously around this place (or
the internets in general).
> But whose fault is it?
I'd say it's the technology's fault. A newsgroup seems to be the
e
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:07:47PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:58:37 -0500, H. S. Teoh
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:24:34PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >>Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no
> >>offense for picking o
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:58:37 -0500, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:24:34PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no
offense for picking on you Andrej), and couple that with the
newsgroup's seemingly random decision to s
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:53:29 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 3/10/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no offense
for picking on you Andrej), and couple that with the newsgroup's
seemingly
random decision to start a new thread, or
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:24:34PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:05:00 -0500, Ary Manzana
> wrote:
>
> >What are you talking about?
>
> Who are you talking to?
>
> :)
>
> Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no
> offense for picking on you
On 3/10/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no offense
> for picking on you Andrej), and couple that with the newsgroup's seemingly
> random decision to start a new thread, or put a reply at the same level, I
> sometimes have no idea what
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:05:00 -0500, Ary Manzana
wrote:
What are you talking about?
Who are you talking to?
:)
Seriously, though, I think Andrej sometimes quotes *nothing* (no offense
for picking on you Andrej), and couple that with the newsgroup's seemingly
random decision to start a
What are you talking about?
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:23:17 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/9/12 8:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As may serialization library Orange already does:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18386187/orange_docs/orange.serialization.Serializable.html
Look for "NonSerialized".
Saw that after posting.
On 3/9/12 8:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As may serialization library Orange already does:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18386187/orange_docs/orange.serialization.Serializable.html
Look for "NonSerialized".
Saw that after posting. Cool!
Andrei
P.S. Please don't overquote, you systematically do so
On Friday, March 09, 2012 16:00:03 Manu wrote:
> Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no real
> resistance, and is tentatively planned?
> Sounds good to me.
I wouldn't really say that it's tentatively planned. I don't recall Walter
ever weighing in on it at all, and
On 9 March 2012 19:23, Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2012-03-09 16:15:30 +, Andrei Alexandrescu <
> seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org**> said:
>
> I think a good approach in D would be to define mixins that work in
>> conjunction with the feature involved, for example:
>>
>> class A {
>> int thi
On 2012-03-09 16:15:30 +, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
I think a good approach in D would be to define mixins that work in
conjunction with the feature involved, for example:
class A {
int thing;
mixin(DoNotSerialize!"thing");
...
}
or together:
class A {
mixin(DoNotSe
On 9 March 2012 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
>
>> Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
>> entities?
>>
>> In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
>> compile time information. I'd like to be able to do th
On 2012-03-09 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on
occasio
That's easy to implement and extremely ugly.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
>> entities?
>>
>> In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
>
On 3/9/12 2:56 AM, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
For instance, I'm serialising some struct/cla
On 9 March 2012 17:20, bearophile wrote:
> Manu:
>
>
> Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no
>> real
>> resistance, and is tentatively planned?
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>
> As far as I know there are no concrete ideas yet for the semantics and
> precise usage of
Manu:
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but
there is no real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
As far as I know there are no concrete ideas yet for the
semantics and precise usage of this feature. And I think there
are different ideas regarding
Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no real
resistance, and is tentatively planned?
Sounds good to me.
On 9 March 2012 15:42, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 09.03.2012 14:56, Manu wrote:
>
>> Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to
>> entit
On 09.03.2012 14:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
There is a potential for them. At least technically everything with @ in
front of it was supposed to be an annotation (like @property). I think
it's just, sort of, reserved for future.
On 2012-03-09 11:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
Unfortunately no.
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
For instance, I'm seri
On 09-03-2012 11:56, Manu wrote:
Does D have a nice way to add annotations or custom attributes to entities?
Unfortunately, no.
In Java/C# for example, it is common to annotate things with useful
compile time information. I'd like to be able to do that in D on occasion.
Yes. This is a very
25 matches
Mail list logo
