On 31/01/2011 17:01, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
Now, what we need is the audio-equivalent of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcIJXTlugc
Damn, pretty damn impressive!
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
2011/1/30 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
People who use screen readers often crank up the playback rate to 2x. The
software adjusts the pitch so it doesn't sound like the Chipmunks.
I've often wondered why DVRs don't do this (I've sent the suggestion to
Tivo,
2011/1/31 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
I think the reason I.E. YouTube and Tivo don't do it is that AFAIU, it
is fairly CPU-consuming (FFT back and forth?) In the TiVo-case, my
guess is nobody paid for the hardware, and in the YouTube-case I doubt
neither Flash nor JavaScript will
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
Of course, I don't know what HW the Tivo is using, perhaps they're just lazy. :)
I thought that DSP's were programmable.
I might be wrong, I hardly ever get to touch things that low-level,
unfortunately.
However, I think the DSP:s included in most STB:s are severely limited
in how much you can twist them. AFAIU, that's one quiet important
aspect of the whole HTML5 video-codec debacle. I.E. in the boxes I
work with,
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
I might be wrong, I hardly ever get to touch things that low-level,
unfortunately.
However, I think the DSP:s included in most STB:s are severely limited
in how much you can twist them. AFAIU, that's one quiet important
aspect of the whole HTML5 video-codec debacle. I.E.
