On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 20:26:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10147
This problem is because the compiler processes warnings too
early. If the is expression issues only warnings, it probably
should succeed, because those warnings don't escape
Jonathan M Davis:
However, I'm sure that we disagree on the best handling of
warnings in that I
want them gone _completely_, whereas you seem to want to always
add more of them.
I'd like a list of all the warnings I have asked for. Recently I
have asked for a warning, but in the enhancement
On 6/30/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I want them gone _completely_
You still need them for language features that go through a deprecation stage.
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 02:03:47 bearophile wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
> > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10147
>
> I have aggregated a request of mine to your issue 10147. Are you
> OK with this? (What I am asking in addition to your request is
> for informational warnings to be a
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 22:26:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
John Colvin:
I've been using D heavily for well over a year now and I've
never used -w (facepalm)
That's good anecdotal evidence that it should be opt-out not
opt-in.
Brb... Recompiling all my code with -w to find out my stupid
mi
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 23:28:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
As for the whole -w/-wi thing, why can't people just
read the list of switches?
I have seen tens of times that this doesn't happen, in D.learn,
in #D on IRC and with friends, students, etc. Silent compilers
that keep the muzzle shut
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 16:07:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to remove the "-w" switch from the list of dmd/ldc2
switches, and later to remove that functionality too. It's
better to keep only the informational warnings.
I keep seeing people in D.learn that miss warnings because they
On 6/30/13, bearophile wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic:
>
>> I still want to ability for compilation to halt on a warning,
>
> It's a fair desire, but for it probably the problems in Issue
> 10321 need to be faced first.
I've added a reply to the bugzilla issue, I think I might not even
need this behavi
Jonathan M Davis:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10147
I have aggregated a request of mine to your issue 10147. Are you
OK with this? (What I am asking in addition to your request is
for informational warnings to be active on default and to be
disabled on request.)
Bye,
bea
Andrej Mitrovic:
I still want to ability for compilation to halt on a warning,
It's a fair desire, but for it probably the problems in Issue
10321 need to be faced first.
As for the whole -w/-wi thing, why can't people just
read the list of switches?
I have seen tens of times that this
On 6/30/13, bearophile wrote:
> If you seem my first point, I am suggesting to remove "-w" from
> the switches and to use "-wi" (actually I am suggesting "-wi" to
> become the default compilation mode).
Regardless of any FR's I still want to ability for compilation to halt
on a warning, even if i
John Colvin:
I've been using D heavily for well over a year now and I've
never used -w (facepalm)
That's good anecdotal evidence that it should be opt-out not
opt-in.
Brb... Recompiling all my code with -w to find out my stupid
mistakes :p
If you seem my first point, I am suggesting to rem
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 16:07:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to remove the "-w" switch from the list of dmd/ldc2
switches, and later to remove that functionality too. It's
better to keep only the informational warnings.
I keep seeing people in D.learn that miss warnings because they
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 18:07:55 bearophile wrote:
> I suggest to remove the "-w" switch from the list of dmd/ldc2
> switches, and later to remove that functionality too. It's better
> to keep only the informational warnings.
>
> I keep seeing people in D.learn that miss warnings because they
>
w0rp:
This might increase knowledge like you say. Plus, you'd have
warnings about stuff like implicit switch case fall-through as
the default. I think this idea sounds okay.
I think a "strong, silent type" of D compiler is not the best.
Maybe Walter can offer an opinion, even negative :-)
By
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 16:07:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to remove the "-w" switch from the list of dmd/ldc2
switches, and later to remove that functionality too. It's
better to keep only the informational warnings.
I keep seeing people in D.learn that miss warnings because they
16 matches
Mail list logo
