Peter Alexander wrote:
I agree that cmd sucks.
I disagree that people use Visual Studio because cmd sucks.
At home I'm a Mac user, but at work I use Visual Studio. I've
used Eclipse, XCode, code blocks, vim+makefiles, and I can
easily say that Visual Studio is far and away the best
developme
On 13 December 2011 21:50, Peter Alexander wrote:
> On 12/12/11 6:09 PM, Hans Uhlig wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> I think either would be fine, but having
On 12/12/11 6:09 PM, Hans Uhlig wrote:
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
anything on
Windows is a no-no these days in terms o
On Tuesday, 13 December 2011 at 15:23:59 UTC, Mirko Pilger wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/46
looking forward to try this out. thanks for your work.
Here is the compiled file from current docs:
http://dump.thecybershadow.net/115d4504aa073d18ad
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/46
looking forward to try this out. thanks for your work.
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 22:28:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/12/2011 8:57 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Anyway, it's probably worth doing the work of using the
d-p-l.org files. I could
use the opportunity to move some of the hacks out of chmgen
into the docs as
proper fixes.
I do
On 13 December 2011 01:59, Andrei Alexandrescu <
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> On 12/12/11 1:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> On Monday, December 12, 2011 20:39:11 Manu wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 December 2011 20:09, Hans Uhlig wrote:
>>>
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>
On 12/12/11 1:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2011 20:39:11 Manu wrote:
On 12 December 2011 20:09, Hans Uhlig wrote:
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either wo
On 12/12/2011 8:57 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Anyway, it's probably worth doing the work of using the d-p-l.org files. I could
use the opportunity to move some of the hacks out of chmgen into the docs as
proper fixes.
I do appreciate the effort you're putting into this. I think chmgen will b
On 2011-12-12 20:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2011 20:39:11 Manu wrote:
On 12 December 2011 20:09, Hans Uhlig wrote:
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either wo
On Monday, December 12, 2011 20:39:11 Manu wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 20:09, Hans Uhlig wrote:
> > On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> >> On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>> On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> I think either would be fine, but having to u
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 18:43:43 UTC, Hans Uhlig wrote:
Actually it might be nice instead of ddoc creating HTML if it
created an intermediate XML or JSON format of documentation
that could be transformed via XSLT+CSS into the final product
be it html, chm, manpages etc.
The macro syste
On 12/10/2011 9:52 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
In fact, as much of the documentation-
generation as possible should be in ddoc IMHO. That way, anyone can get
reasonable documentation for their own projects.
I agree to an extent, but at the same time, I like keeping ddoc
On 12 December 2011 20:09, Hans Uhlig wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>>
I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
anything on
Wind
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
anything on
Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
Since dmd is a command li
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 06:57:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2011 9:46 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Yes, that was what I was going to do. However, the layout of
files generated for
d-programming-language.org differs substantially from those
included in the zip
file, so I'm asking
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 12:10:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Wouldn't it be better if ddoc generate the correct HTML from
the beginning.
I touched upon this in another post... I say both yes and no.
Yes because it'd be nice. A table of contents seems generally
useful, and correct anchors
On 2011-12-11 07:52, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/10/11 10:14 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Anything automated rox.
cool. I updated the program today to handle the new site. Take a
look at the output:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html
[snip]
Yah, there'
On 2011-12-11 05:14, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Anything automated rox.
cool. I updated the program today to handle the new site. Take a
look at the output:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html
Biggest improvement imo is anchors work better:
http://arsdnet.net/d-
On 12/11/2011 9:46 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Yes, that was what I was going to do. However, the layout of files generated for
d-programming-language.org differs substantially from those included in the zip
file, so I'm asking if there's a way to avoid having to modify chmgen to work
with the
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 05:33:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2011 9:11 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 05:08:28 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/11/2011 9:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I began work on this and ported chmgen to D2. However,
chmgen wa
On 12/11/2011 9:11 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 05:08:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2011 9:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I began work on this and ported chmgen to D2. However, chmgen was written to
operate on the files as they appear in the DMD zip fil
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 05:08:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/11/2011 9:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I began work on this and ported chmgen to D2. However, chmgen
was written to
operate on the files as they appear in the DMD zip files, not
the ones on
d-programming-language.org. H
On 12/11/2011 9:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I began work on this and ported chmgen to D2. However, chmgen was written to
operate on the files as they appear in the DMD zip files, not the ones on
d-programming-language.org. How is the zip file documentation generated?
Do you mean it works o
On Sunday, 11 December 2011 at 02:07:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 6:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:16 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 23:45:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the
distribution
htt
On 11 December 2011 23:26, Peter Alexander wrote:
> On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
>>> anything on
>>> Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
>>>
On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
anything on
Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
Since dmd is a command line tool anyway, why is it a usability problem
t
On Sunday, 11 December 2011 at 06:52:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think the program should not specify "Uncategorized" when
there's no other category.
OK.
Now, on the category tags, part of me wants to link back to
something along the lines of my dpldocs.info site - a dynamic
program t
Le 11/12/2011 01:00, Walter Bright a écrit :
> On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote:
>> Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows
>> user, and I
>> will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution,
>> which is the
>> standard expected by any windows developer
On 11 December 2011 03:52, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>
>> I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
>> anything on
>> Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
>>
>
> Since dmd is a command line tool anyway, why is i
On 12/10/11 10:14 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Anything automated rox.
cool. I updated the program today to handle the new site. Take a
look at the output:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html
[snip]
Yah, there's definite improvement. Adding categorization by
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> In fact, as much of the documentation-
> generation as possible should be in ddoc IMHO. That way, anyone can get
> reasonable documentation for their own projects.
I agree to an extent, but at the same time, I like keeping ddoc itself fairly
simple.
Correct anchors fro
On Saturday, December 10, 2011 23:14:20 Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Anyway it's pretty much complete here. Let me know what you think.
Overall, I like what I see here, but I definitely that that ddoc itself should
be fixed so that it generates proper anchors instead of requiring you to
manipulate the
Also, I was just wondering how it'd work on a page like std.container
http://www.d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_container.html
which already has a hand written table up top. So I ran it:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_container.html
and I'm ok with it. In the d-p-l page, can you tell
Walter Bright Wrote:
> It just statically serves html. No cgi.
See my reply to Andrei - the program modifies the static
html ahead of time, so it just needs to be part of the build
process, not part of the deployment.
Here's a link to see its output:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Anything automated rox.
cool. I updated the program today to handle the new site. Take a
look at the output:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html
Biggest improvement imo is anchors work better:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/std_stdio.html#File.writeln
is dis
On 12/10/11 8:13 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Essentially, I'd like to have the .chm files automatically built by the makefile
for the html documentation.
I'm curious: what kind of setup do you have there?
It's a makefile you can find on github.
The jump list in D's lib do
On 12/10/2011 6:13 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Essentially, I'd like to have the .chm files automatically built by the makefile
for the html documentation.
I'm curious: what kind of setup do you have there?
The jump list in D's lib docs are very bad right now, and we could i
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Essentially, I'd like to have the .chm files automatically built by the
> makefile
> for the html documentation.
I'm curious: what kind of setup do you have there?
The jump list in D's lib docs are very bad right now, and we could improve the
javascript behind them, but I
On 12/10/2011 6:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 4:16 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 23:45:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5470
Awesome, I had ov
On 12/10/2011 4:16 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 23:45:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5470
Awesome, I had overlooked that. Can you do a pull request to p
On Saturday, December 10, 2011 17:52:18 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> > I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for
> > anything on Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
>
> Since dmd is a command line tool anyway, wh
On 12/10/2011 5:05 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Well now I could do the same thing with dman and it would open my
browser instead. But dman wasn't around before.. ;)
dman has suffered a bit from lack of TLC. But that can be fixed.
On 12/10/2011 4:44 PM, Manu wrote:
So it's imperative to get that part just right, and that's all
about the docs and presentation for me.
I agree with you.
On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for anything on
Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability.
Since dmd is a command line tool anyway, why is it a usability problem to use
dman?
On 12/10/2011 4:10 PM, Mirko Pilger wrote:
I didn't think anyone preferred chm over web pages anymore!
personally i prefer chm > pdf > web for technical documentations and ebooks on
the desktop.
We've got an ebook now for the D spec, and hope to get one done for Phobos.
On 12/11/11, Walter Bright wrote:
> I didn't think anyone preferred chm over web pages anymore!
It is for me. All I have to do to get to some documentation of a
symbol is highlight the symbol and hit F1, and the CHM with the
section on that symbol comes up.
Well now I could do the same thing wit
On 11 December 2011 02:00, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote:
>
>> Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows user,
>> and I
>> will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution, which
>> is the
>> standard expected by any windows dev
On 11/12/11 12:00 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote:
Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows
user, and I
will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution,
which is the
standard expected by any windows developer from any sdk the
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 23:45:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the
distribution
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5470
On 11 December 2011 02:04, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Create a .chm with this: http://thecybershadow.net/d/docs/
>
Wow, see, that's exactly what I'm talking about! :) .. (although I tried
downloading that chm and it doesn't work...)
There's an amazing amount of work and energy spent here, but there
I didn't think anyone preferred chm over web pages anymore!
personally i prefer chm > pdf > web for technical documentations and
ebooks on the desktop.
On Saturday, December 10, 2011 16:00:15 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows
> > user, and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the
> > distribution, which is the standard expected by any windo
On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote:
Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows user, and I
will never type this. There should be a .chm in the distribution, which is the
standard expected by any windows developer from any sdk they intend to take
seriously. This is very eas
Create a .chm with this: http://thecybershadow.net/d/docs/
There should be a .chm in the distribution
+1
On 10 December 2011 21:28, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 9:21 AM, Manu wrote:
>
>> Okay, so is this the official documentation for the language?
>> Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
>>
>> I ask because literally 50% if things I've looked up in the last 2 days
>> are
>> undocumen
On 10 December 2011 20:08, Trass3r wrote:
> Am 10.12.2011, 18:21 Uhr, schrieb Manu :
>
>
> Okay, so is this the official documentation for the language?
>> Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
>>
>
> You mean .org
> Yes this is the official documentation and yes it is lacking in some are
v2.055 to v2.056
v2.055 to v2.057b
On 12/10/2011 1:48 PM, Mirko Pilger wrote:
I think dman didn't get updated properly on that platform. It does work
properly on Windows.
obviously i'm missing something here. within the downloaded archives for v2.055
to v2.056 i can only find binaries of dman for freebsd, linux and osx but not
f
I think dman didn't get updated properly on that platform. It does work
properly on Windows.
obviously i'm missing something here. within the downloaded archives for
v2.055 to v2.056 i can only find binaries of dman for freebsd, linux and
osx but not for windows. :/
On 12/10/2011 12:52 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 12/10/2011 03:50 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 12/10/2011 02:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yup. In general, you can find the documentation on a particular keyword
by typing in:
dman keyword
Interesting, but doesn't work for me:
chad@Hugin ~ $ dman auto
x-w
On 12/10/2011 02:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> Yup. In general, you can find the documentation on a particular keyword
> by typing in:
>
>dman keyword
Interesting, but doesn't work for me:
chad@Hugin ~ $ dman auto
x-www-browser: No such file or directory
chad@Hugin ~ $
On 12/10/2011 03:50 PM, Chad J wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 02:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> Yup. In general, you can find the documentation on a particular keyword
>> by typing in:
>>
>>dman keyword
>
> Interesting, but doesn't work for me:
>
> chad@Hugin ~ $ dman auto
> x-www-browser: No such
On 12/10/2011 9:21 AM, Manu wrote:
Okay, so is this the official documentation for the language?
Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
I ask because literally 50% if things I've looked up in the last 2 days are
undocumented.
Many of them have some heading reserved, with no content.
Here
Am 10.12.2011, 18:21 Uhr, schrieb Manu :
Okay, so is this the official documentation for the language?
Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
You mean .org
Yes this is the official documentation and yes it is lacking in some areas.
You may also get Andrei's book "The D programming langua
On 10 December 2011 19:21, Manu wrote:
> Okay, so is this the official documentation for the language?
> Is there somewhere else I should be looking?
>
> I ask because literally 50% if things I've looked up in the last 2 days
> are undocumented.
> Many of them have some heading reserved, with no
67 matches
Mail list logo
