On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 17:04:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 18:04:29 Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 13:46:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:05:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wr
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 21:12:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 19:19:18 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
> That being the case, I'd argue in favor of language
> consistency
Here I'd like D AAs act as Python dicts. This means breaking
"consistency".
I'm afraid
Jonathan M Davis:
I'm afraid that you'll have to be more specific in terms of
what you mean.
Please ignore what I have said...
As such, I see no reason why it should matter that NaN
is effectively unusable as an AA key.
OK.
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 19:19:18 bearophile wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
> > That being the case, I'd argue in favor of language consistency
>
> Here I'd like D AAs act as Python dicts. This means breaking
> "consistency".
I'm afraid that you'll have to be more specific in terms of what you mean.
Jonathan M Davis:
That being the case, I'd argue in favor of language consistency
Here I'd like D AAs act as Python dicts. This means breaking
"consistency".
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 18:04:29 Maxim Fomin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 13:46:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:05:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >> >More to the point, *if* typeinfo isn't meant to mat
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 13:46:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:05:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>More to the point, *if* typeinfo isn't meant to match == for
>whatever
>reason, then why is it being used as the stan
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:05:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >More to the point, *if* typeinfo isn't meant to match == for whatever
> >reason, then why is it being used as the standard of comparison for
> >AA keys?
> >
>
> I guess we nee
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
More to the point, *if* typeinfo isn't meant to match == for
whatever
reason, then why is it being used as the standard of comparison
for AA
keys?
I guess we need NaN == NaN to be true for AA keys, no ?