On Friday, 19 November 2010 at 06:53:40 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:26:39 +, Steve Teale wrote:
I had D code that provided a basis for creation of Windows
services,
which I have just tried to get working with the latest D2.
No dice.
I have made some progress in underst
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:21:41 -0500, Jason House wrote:
> Steve Teale Wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:17 -0500, Jason House wrote:
>>
>> > A cast to immutable is required when constructing immutable objects.
>> > The type system can't prove that's safe. It's a design limitation to
>> > keep
Steve Teale Wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:17 -0500, Jason House wrote:
>
> > A cast to immutable is required when constructing immutable objects. The
> > type system can't prove that's safe. It's a design limitation to keep
> > complexity low.
> >
> Jason,
>
> But design limitations like t
Steve Teale:
> I admire your dedication to language theory and purity, but there are
> many who'd translate that to impracticality and obscurity.
I like that idea about immutables & strong pure functions, but it was not an
idea of mine :-) That enhancement request in Bugzilla is not written by
On 19-nov-10, at 17:42, Steve Teale wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:23:44 -0500, bearophile wrote:
Regarding the creation of immutable data structures, there is a
proposal
that is probably able to remove some of the pain: the result of
strongly
pure functions may become implicitly castable
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:23:44 -0500, bearophile wrote:
> Regarding the creation of immutable data structures, there is a proposal
> that is probably able to remove some of the pain: the result of strongly
> pure functions may become implicitly castable to immutable.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
BP,
I a
19.11.2010 19:08, Steve Teale пишет:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:58:26 +0300, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Have you tried OutputDebugString()? It's WinAPI function that sends
strings to the 'debugger'. DebugView application from SysInternals suite
nicely prints those strings, and also times them.
How is
Steve Teale:
> Languages can't be designed just on theory - some recognition of
> practicality is also required.
In the case of creation of immutable data structures it looks the opposite to
me: DMD is too much pragmatic and there isn't enough theory behind it :-)
> But design limitations lik
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:58:26 +0300, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> Have you tried OutputDebugString()? It's WinAPI function that sends
> strings to the 'debugger'. DebugView application from SysInternals suite
> nicely prints those strings, and also times them.
How is this better than the event log. I
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:17 -0500, Jason House wrote:
> A cast to immutable is required when constructing immutable objects. The
> type system can't prove that's safe. It's a design limitation to keep
> complexity low.
>
Jason,
But design limitations like that will force programmers who are on
18.11.2010 21:53, Steve Teale пишет:
As you can imagine, this is terrible to debug - printf or similar is bad
enough, but for the service I'm pushing entries into the Windows event
logger system. [...]
But first I think I'll stop and do some carpentry for a couple of days.
Then eventually someth
A cast to immutable is required when constructing immutable objects. The type
system can't prove that's safe. It's a design limitation to keep complexity low.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_regexp.html
Looking at the Regexp docs, find isn't marked const or pure. If that's an
oversit
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:49:30 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
As I said before, I don't know if the thread being created by the
windows service procedure is properly initializing the D modules of the
library/runtime. Try as the first line of ServiceMain to initialize the
current thread:
auto myt
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:26:39 +, Steve Teale wrote:
> I had D code that provided a basis for creation of Windows services,
> which I have just tried to get working with the latest D2.
>
> No dice.
>
I have made some progress in understanding this. It appears that any D
static data structures
> As I said before, I don't know if the thread being created by the
> windows service procedure is properly initializing the D modules of the
> library/runtime. Try as the first line of ServiceMain to initialize the
> current thread:
>
> auto mythread = thread_attachThis();
>
> see http://www.d
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:53:53 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:33:12 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think using a class in D is a good idea. But what you may need is
global functions which forward to your class methods. This is how I
would probably do it.
-Steve
S
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:33:12 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> I think using a class in D is a good idea. But what you may need is
> global functions which forward to your class methods. This is how I
> would probably do it.
>
> -Steve
Steve,
Thanks. I kind of went that way. Having done
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:26:39 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
I had D code that provided a basis for creation of Windows services,
which I have just tried to get working with the latest D2.
No dice.
The point of failure was in this method
static void StartService()
{
if (!StartServiceCtrlDis
I'm not familiar with the API, but are you able to declare your original _sta
as immutable and call it a day? Immutable data should have the same protection
as __gshared but with no implications of bypassing the type system.
If that's not helpful, can you give more details like calling patterns?
I had D code that provided a basis for creation of Windows services,
which I have just tried to get working with the latest D2.
No dice.
The point of failure was in this method
static void StartService()
{
if (!StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA(cast(SERVICE_TABLE_ENTRY *) &_sta[0]))
{
...
20 matches
Mail list logo
