Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 23:24:32 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 07:56:04 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: [...] siege makes a difference. Earlier I had two chrome windows open and I just tried a simple GET from each, with a considerable delay and I saw the same thread

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 07:56:04 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 22:37:22 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: [...] I have change my example a little: case "/": res.writeBody("Hello World " ~ to!string(thisThreadID), "text/plain"); And I get this (siege -p -c15 0b -t

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 07:56:04 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 22:37:22 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: [...] I have change my example a little: case "/": res.writeBody("Hello World " ~ to!string(thisThreadID), "text/plain"); And I get this (siege -p -c15 0b -t

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 22:37:22 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: That could be the reason for slowness. Ubuntu 17.10 64 bit, DMD v2.079.1, E7-4860, 8 core 32 GB RAM. With slight modifcaition to capture the timestamp of the request on the server: import std.datetime.systime : Clock;

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 21:55:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: On which system? AFAIK HTTPServerOption.reusePort works on Linux but maybe not on others OSes. Other question is what events driver is use (libasync, libevent, vibe-core) On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Arun Chandrasekaran via

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On which system? AFAIK HTTPServerOption.reusePort works on Linux but maybe not on others OSes. Other question is what events driver is use (libasync, libevent, vibe-core) On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Arun Chandrasekaran via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 30

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 17:23:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Maybe this one: import vibe.d; import std.regex; import std.array : appender; static reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$"; void main() { setupWorkerThreads(logicalProcessorCount); runWorkerTaskDist();

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:44:30 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 17:23:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Maybe this one: clip vibedtest ~master: building configuration "dmd"... Linking... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent /usr/bin/ld: cannot find

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:44:30 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote: I tried to run the example, and I'm struck with a linker error DMD v2.076.1 and LDC 1.4.0. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent_pthreads Did you try installing libevent and libevent-pthreads?

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 17:23:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Maybe this one: import vibe.d; import std.regex; import std.array : appender; static reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$"; void main() { setupWorkerThreads(logicalProcessorCount); runWorkerTaskDist();

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Maybe this one: import vibe.d; import std.regex; import std.array : appender; static reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$"; void main() { setupWorkerThreads(logicalProcessorCount); runWorkerTaskDist(); runApplication(); } void runServer() { auto settings = new

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: my version: https://paste.ofcode.org/RLX7GM6SHh3DjBBHd7wshj

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 09:45:13 UTC, tchaloupka wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 08:36:31 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 08:01:02 UTC, tchaloupka wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 07:05:57 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: [...] I've just tried this on

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 13:18:45 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Not at all. Rust test is fake. Does not process headers, does not write headers. Does not send right output. Does not work with browser. Every one or two request it will die. Rust result shoud not be taken seriously. Until

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Not at all. Rust test is fake. Does not process headers, does not write headers. Does not send right output. Does not work with browser. Every one or two request it will die. Rust result shoud not be taken seriously. Until fixed Dne 25. 9. 2017 11:50 dopoledne napsal uživatel "tchaloupka via

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 08:36:31 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 08:01:02 UTC, tchaloupka wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 07:05:57 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 06:56:58 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Sunday, 24 September 2017

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 08:01:02 UTC, tchaloupka wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 07:05:57 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 06:56:58 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 22:54:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: How on earth can that be

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 07:05:57 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 06:56:58 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 22:54:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: How on earth can that be unfair when the Go, node.js and Scala versions appear to use

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On 2017-09-24 20:36, Vadim Lopatin wrote: nuald reverted change which enables multithreading since it's "unfair". That's kind of stupid. In a real world scenario one would do everything possible to get the best performance. If one of the frameworks doesn't support mutlithreading, too bad

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Monday, 25 September 2017 at 06:56:58 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 22:54:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: How on earth can that be unfair when the Go, node.js and Scala versions appear to use multi-threading, too? Looks like repo owner thinks they are single

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 22:54:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: How on earth can that be unfair when the Go, node.js and Scala versions appear to use multi-threading, too? Looks like repo owner thinks they are single threaded.

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Am 24.09.2017 um 20:36 schrieb Vadim Lopatin: On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 09:40:00 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: What's was the last status? Could you observe any meaningful thread scaling? It works for me - multithreading improves performance on my PC. So far, test results on

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 18:36:50 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 09:40:00 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: What's was the last status? Could you observe any meaningful thread scaling? It works for me - multithreading improves performance on my PC. So far, test

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 09:40:00 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: What's was the last status? Could you observe any meaningful thread scaling? It works for me - multithreading improves performance on my PC. So far, test results on https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark show that D is

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Sunday, 24 September 2017 at 08:08:35 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 22:07:58 UTC, bitwise wrote: [...] Can you give a bit more details? What kind of architectures do you mean (hardware, software, ..)? What was your use case? IO-multiplexing,

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Saturday, 23 September 2017 at 22:07:58 UTC, bitwise wrote: Of the few different architectures I tried, the fiber based approach was much slower. It's possible that my implementation did too many unnecessary context switches. Can you give a bit more details? What kind of architectures do

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Friday, 22 September 2017 at 09:48:47 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 21.09.2017 um 20:49 schrieb bitwise: Doesn't vibe-d use Fibers? I tried to build a simple web server with a fiber-based approach once - it was horribly slow. I hope C# (and soon C++) style stackless resumable functions

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On 9/21/17 11:49, bitwise wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent PR to include D benchmark

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d). I was hoping it could show

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Am 21.09.2017 um 20:49 schrieb bitwise: Doesn't vibe-d use Fibers? I tried to build a simple web server with a fiber-based approach once - it was horribly slow. I hope C# (and soon C++) style stackless resumable functions will eventually come to D. It uses them and the overhead actually

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Am 22.09.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Vadim Lopatin: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 19:40:48 UTC, bitwise wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:55:04 UTC, Vadim Lopatin It does. But Golang uses them, too. Goroutines. Indeed. I'm reading about them right now, and they seem to be

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 19:40:48 UTC, bitwise wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:55:04 UTC, Vadim Lopatin It does. But Golang uses them, too. Goroutines. Indeed. I'm reading about them right now, and they seem to be "multiplexed". I wonder if Vibe.d does something similar.

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:55:04 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:49:00 UTC, bitwise wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: [...] Doesn't vibe-d use Fibers? I tried to build a simple web server with a fiber-based

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d). I was hoping it could show

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 18:49:00 UTC, bitwise wrote: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 17:13:16 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Ok, maybe there is a some small improvments, but it is nothing what would make this faster than rust and still undere 30K on my pc More test results: On my Win10 PC, DMD/x86/libevent:27-29K, Go:31-33K

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Ok, maybe there is a some small improvments, but it is nothing what would make this faster than rust and still undere 30K on my pc On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > in this situation I dont thing there will be difference > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

in this situation I dont thing there will be difference On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is > it slower? >

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Other implementations use switch. https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/406dafbedbd9 is it slower?

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

with dmd 26K - 28K witlh ldc 27K - 29K On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: > >> Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without >>

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:46:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement Do you see any benefits from using LDC instead of DMD?

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without VibeManualMemoryManagement On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement > helped in some cases too. > > On Thu, Sep 21,

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

s'/sema/same/ On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > Ok, after some more testing it seems it is almost sema with or without > VibeManualMemoryManagement > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > >> And it seems it is faster

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

And it seems it is faster with GC. So removing VibeManualMemoryManagement helped in some cases too. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too: > > { > "name": "vibedtest", > "targetName": "vibedtest", >

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

BTW: I have changed dub.json a little too: { "name": "vibedtest", "targetName": "vibedtest", "targetType": "executable", "targetPath": "bin", "dependencies": { "vibe-d": "~>0.8.2-alpha.1" }, "subConfigurations": {"vibe-d": "libevent"}, "versions": [

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 13:09:33 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR Thank you! Updated.

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

wrong version, this is my letest version: https://paste.ofcode.org/qWsQikdhKiAywgBpKwANFR On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Kozak wrote: > my version: https://paste.ofcode.org/RLX7GM6SHh3DjBBHd7wshj > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d < >

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

my version: https://paste.ofcode.org/RLX7GM6SHh3DjBBHd7wshj On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > Am 21.09.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Vadim Lopatin: > >> On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>>

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

my results: OS lang:config req/scomments === ===== == Linuxgo24K LinuxD:libevent27K4 threads LinuxD:libasync 26.5K 4 threads On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d <

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Am 21.09.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Vadim Lopatin: On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: shared static this() { (...) } BTW, I'd recommend using     void main()     {     (...)     runApplication();     } instead and dropping the

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 10:21:17 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:     shared static this()     {     (...)     } BTW, I'd recommend using void main() { (...) runApplication(); } instead and dropping the VibeDefaultMain version in the package recipe. The

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

    shared static this()     {     (...)     } BTW, I'd recommend using void main() { (...) runApplication(); } instead and dropping the VibeDefaultMain version in the package recipe. The old approach is planned to be faded out slowly, because it requires

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Am 21.09.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Vadim Lopatin: There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d). I was hoping it could show performance at least

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:18:51 UTC, Suliman wrote: Can it be issue with regex speed? auto reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$"; Did you try without it? Regex is used for request paths like "/greeting/username" and not used for path "/" There is no big slowdown caused by regex.

Re: Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

Can it be issue with regex speed? auto reg = ctRegex!"^/greeting/([a-z]+)$"; Did you try without it?

Simple web server benchmark - vibe.d is slower than node.js and Go?

There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js): https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark I've sent PR to include D benchmark (vibe.d). I was hoping it could show performance at least not worse than other languages. But it appears