On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:18:38 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Okay. I really don't know much about garbage collectors, how they work,
or what makes one particularly good or bad
Me too.
But its a central part of the D langauge, its design and runtime.
Even though D programmmers can replace
Okay. I really don't know much about garbage collectors, how they work, or what
makes one particularly good or bad (other than the fact that it needs to be
efficient execution-wise and manage memory wisely so that you don't use too
much
of it or do anything else that would be an overall
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:18:38 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. I really don't know much about garbage collectors, how they work,
or what makes one particularly good or bad (other than the fact that it
needs to be efficient execution-wise and manage memory wisely so
Jonathan M Davis, el 15 de julio a las 00:18 me escribiste:
Okay. I really don't know much about garbage collectors, how they work, or
what
makes one particularly good or bad (other than the fact that it needs to be
efficient execution-wise and manage memory wisely so that you don't use too
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:28:43 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:18:38 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. I really don't know much about garbage collectors, how they work,
or what makes one particularly good or bad
If I had to chose one topic with most bitchin' on this newsgroup I have
impression it would be the one about GC. They usually goes from 'GC managed
programs are slow, D ain't good enough', to 'language X has better GC than D',
to ' GC that D has is bad at Z'.
Why not make D summer of code -
Anyway, I'm here bitching myself :) Just want to say that idea to have more
than one GC type to chose when compiling would be very interesting thing, if
single implementation can't be good for all cases.
If I had to chose one topic with most bitchin' on this newsgroup I have
impression it
== Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
Anyway, I'm here bitching myself :) Just want to say that idea to have more
than
one GC type to chose when compiling would be very interesting thing, if single
implementation can't be good for all cases.
If I had to chose one
Bane, el 15 de julio a las 14:34 me escribiste:
If I had to chose one topic with most bitchin' on this newsgroup
I have impression it would be the one about GC. They usually goes from
'GC managed programs are slow, D ain't good enough', to 'language
X has better GC than D', to ' GC that D has
dsimcha, el 15 de julio a las 19:23 me escribiste:
== Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
Anyway, I'm here bitching myself :) Just want to say that idea to have more
than
one GC type to chose when compiling would be very interesting thing, if single
implementation
== Quote from Leandro Lucarella (l...@llucax.com.ar)'s article
dsimcha, el 15 de julio a las 19:23 me escribiste:
== Quote from Bane (branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com)'s article
Anyway, I'm here bitching myself :) Just want to say that idea to have
more than
one GC type to chose when
11 matches
Mail list logo
