I hope Andrei appreciated my efforts :-)
- The non-alphabetical index page 439 is a good idea.
- The page thickness is OK for me.
More comments on Chapter 1:
Page 17: using null to represent empty arrays is not good. In D there is []
that's better for this.
P 18: "foo in
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:51:55 -0400, bearophile wrote:
> P 61: this is so hard to read that I don't want to see anything similar
> even in small script-like programs. The D compiler can even disallow
> such long chains: int c = (a = b, b = 7, 8);
I suppose this mostly explains why the real tuples are
On 07/15/2010 09:10 AM, retard wrote:
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:51:55 -0400, bearophile wrote:
P 61: this is so hard to read that I don't want to see anything similar
even in small script-like programs. The D compiler can even disallow
such long chains: int c = (a = b, b = 7, 8);
I suppose this mos
Weren't you leaving for good this list?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:10:03 -0500, retard wrote:
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:51:55 -0400, bearophile wrote:
P 61: this is so hard to read that I don't want to see anything similar
even in small script-like programs. The D compiler can even disallow
such long
