Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I have *ever* even used wchar/wstring.
Char/string gosh yes;
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I have *ever* even used
wchar/wstring.
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I
Justin Johansson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I
Justin Johansson wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls Wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 27 de octubre a las 19:32 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Bill Baxter, el 27 de octubre a las 13:12 me escribiste:
They are?
...Then what is the point of wstring, dstring?
They are all just different representations of Unicode.
string, which is unicode in
Chris Nicholson-Sauls Wrote:
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I
don't believe I have *ever* even used wchar/wstring. Char/string gosh yes;
dchar/dstring
quite a bit as well, where I need the simplicity; but I've yet to feel much
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I have *ever* even used wchar/wstring.
Char/string gosh yes; dchar/dstring quite a bit as
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:04:33 +0300, Chris Nicholson-Sauls
ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[snip]
Well, I guess. In particular, to me it's not clear what type we should
assign to a concatenation between a string and a wstring. With ~=,
it's much easier...
My intuition would be to expect the same as adding an int to a byte:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls Wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My current thought is to ascribe lhs ~ rhs the same type as lhs
(thereby making ~ consistent with ~= by making lhs ~= rhs same as lhs =
lhs ~ rhs) in case lhs is a string type. If lhs is a character type,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My current thought is to ascribe lhs ~ rhs the same type as lhs (thereby
making ~ consistent with ~= by making lhs ~= rhs same
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My current thought is to ascribe lhs ~ rhs the same type as lhs (thereby
making ~ consistent with ~= by
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My current thought is to ascribe lhs ~ rhs the same type as lhs (thereby
making ~ consistent with ~= by
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My current thought is to
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2009-10-27 09:07:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
My
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
Bill Baxter, el 27 de octubre a las 13:12 me escribiste:
They are?
...Then what is the point of wstring, dstring?
They are all just different representations of Unicode.
string, which is unicode in UTF-8, is good because it's the least
wasteful for mostly ASCII text. And has a nice
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Bill Baxter, el 27 de octubre a las 13:12 me escribiste:
They are?
...Then what is the point of wstring, dstring?
They are all just different representations of Unicode.
string, which is unicode in UTF-8, is good because it's the least
wasteful for mostly ASCII text.
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 27 de octubre a las 19:32 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Bill Baxter, el 27 de octubre a las 13:12 me escribiste:
They are?
...Then what is the point of wstring, dstring?
They are all just different representations of Unicode.
string, which is unicode in
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times PI!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times PI!
A hundred even. ;-)
--bb
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times PI!
A hundred even. ;-)
Coming along. I'm writing about strings and Unicode right now. I was
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times PI!
A hundred even. ;-)
Coming along. I'm writing about strings
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at least 10 times PI!
A hundred even. ;-)
Coming along.
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Soon the PI level, or at
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Come and get them!
33 matches
Mail list logo
