On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:47:56PM +, karabuta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 15:40:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote:
> >>I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or
> >>in-between) C++ bu
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 15:40:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote:
I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or
in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells
me either D is a C++ clone or I need to
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote:
I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or
in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells
me either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before
I really understand D (kind of like C++ is a
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote:
I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or
in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells
me either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before
I really understand D (kind of like C++ is a
I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or
in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells me
either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before I
really understand D (kind of like C++ is a subset of D). I must
say that I never coded C++ beyond "hello,