dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
Seems to me, that you're making use of some primitive that I'll call a
'DivisableArray' -- an array that can be sliced up (into other
DivisibleArrays), and different DivisableArrays can be sent to different
threads. You can extract a
On 3/23/11 10:22 AM, Don wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
> Seems to me, that you're making use of some primitive that I'll call a
> 'DivisableArray' -- an array that can be sliced up (into other
> DivisibleArrays), and different DivisableArrays can be sent to different
> threads. You can extract a normal ar
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality s
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
> On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
> > dsimcha Wrote:
> >
> >> Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
> >> how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
> >> how safety and practicali
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be balanced.
I didn't follow the review of std.parallelism, c
dsimcha Wrote:
> Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
> how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
> how safety and practicality should be balanced.
I didn't follow the review of std.parallelism, can you give some specific
examples?
On 3/23/2011 12:36 AM, Graham St Jack wrote:
Sounds good in principal.
I assume that category a code could be @trusted, and that category b and
c must not be @trusted.
Right, except for the subset of category C code that does make guarantees.
I agree that trying to use the language to discr
On 23/03/11 11:08, dsimcha wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be balanced. On the one hand,
coarse-grained multithreading with hard guarantees aga
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be balanced. On the one hand,
coarse-grained multithreading with hard guarantees against low-level
races is a great th
10 matches
Mail list logo