Hello my questio is:
What makes D, D?
For example:
There are more than one compiler for D, so what makes that interpretation of D,
D?
Didn't the implementers of that compiler change and add additional features to
the language?
Maybe I am missing the point, so please elaborate in either
== Quote from Dimitar Kolev (dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> Hello my questio is:
> What makes D, D?
> For example:
> There are more than one compiler for D, so what makes that interpretation of
> D, D?
> Didn't the implementers of that compiler change
Hello Dimitar,
Hello my questio is:
What makes D, D?
For example:
There are more than one compiler for D, so what makes that
interpretation of D, D?
Didn't the implementers of that compiler change and add additional
features to the language?
Maybe I am missing the point, so p
BCS wrote:
Hello Dimitar,
Hello my questio is:
What makes D, D?
For example:
There are more than one compiler for D, so what makes that
interpretation of D, D?
Didn't the implementers of that compiler change and add additional
features to the language?
Maybe I am missing the poin
Reply to clayasaurus,
BCS wrote:
Hello Dimitar,
Hello my questio is:
What makes D, D?
For example:
There are more than one compiler for D, so what makes that
interpretation of D, D?
Didn't the implementers of that compiler change and add additional
features to the language?
Maybe
> That is a question for a philosopher, right up there with what makes you,
> you? IIRC the body replaces 100% of it's matter several times of your
> life. Some parts more often than others.
No, some parts stay with you for the rest of your life (e.g. nuclear pore
scaffold in brain cells)
What c
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:15:48 -0400, clayasaurus
wrote:
Posting from the future? :)
Sean Kelly wrote:
> Compiler writers are free to add features so long as they're compatible
> with
> the base language--just look at Microsoft's C++ compiler. What makes a D
> compiler a D compiler is that it conforms to the D language spec.
That's not exactly true, now is it? There is no D spec
Michiel Helvensteijn wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Compiler writers are free to add features so long as they're compatible
with
the base language--just look at Microsoft's C++ compiler. What makes a D
compiler a D compiler is that it conforms to the D language spec.
That's not exactly true, now i
Ary Borenszweig Wrote:
> Michiel Helvensteijn wrote:
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> >
> >> Compiler writers are free to add features so long as they're compatible
> >> with
> >> the base language--just look at Microsoft's C++ compiler. What makes a D
> >> compiler a D compiler is that it conforms to th
Dimitar Kolev wrote:
> Now why would someone want to make their own compiler instead of helping
> develop this one is something I do not really understand.
There may be several reasons. Most important is that Walter owns the
original compiler, and only he can decide what goes in and what goes out
Michiel Helvensteijn Wrote:
> Dimitar Kolev wrote:
>
> > Now why would someone want to make their own compiler instead of helping
> > develop this one is something I do not really understand.
>
> There may be several reasons. Most important is that Walter owns the
> original compiler, and only h
> I suppose the answer would be the same, too: The Soul.
Lol
== Quote from Dimitar Kolev ( dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
>
> Also what is the deal with Tango, why make another library instead of
> extending the existing one?
It was kind of an accident. The runtime portion of Tango was previously a
project hoping to be rolled into
the officia
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:15:48 -0400, clayasaurus
wrote:
Posting from the future? :)
Looks like my click was set a day ahead :o
Wonder if its fine now, otherwise blame thunderbird.
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> == Quote from Dimitar Kolev ( dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> >
> > Also what is the deal with Tango, why make another library instead of
> > extending the existing one?
>
> It was kind of an accident. The runtime portion of Tango was previously a
> project hop
== Quote from Dimitar Kolev (dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> > == Quote from Dimitar Kolev ( dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> > >
> > > Also what is the deal with Tango, why make another library instead of
> > > extending the existing one?
> >
> > It wa
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> == Quote from Dimitar Kolev (dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> > Sean Kelly Wrote:
> > > == Quote from Dimitar Kolev ( dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com)'s article
> > > >
> > > > Also what is the deal with Tango, why make another library instead of
> > > > extending
18 matches
Mail list logo
