On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:35:14 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, February 06, 2012 21:40:55 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I thought of a better solution:
pure T[] pureSafeShrink(T)(ref T[] arr, size_t maxLength)
{
if(maxLength < arr.length)
{
bool safeToShrink = (arr.cap
On 02/07/2012 03:48 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:32:05 -0500, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or reserve.
AFAIK, none of them access any global va
On Monday, February 06, 2012 21:40:55 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I thought of a better solution:
>
> pure T[] pureSafeShrink(T)(ref T[] arr, size_t maxLength)
> {
> if(maxLength < arr.length)
> {
> bool safeToShrink = (arr.capacity == arr.length);
> arr = arr[0..maxLengt
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:32:05 -0500, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or reserve.
AFAIK, none of them access any global variables aside from GC-related
stuff (and new is
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:28:49 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:18:21 -0500, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 02:02:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 02:54:40 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 201
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or
reserve. AFAIK, none of them access any global variables aside
from GC-related stuff (and new is already allowed in pure
functions). All it would take to make them p
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:18:21 -0500, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 02:02:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 02:54:40 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> At present, assumeSafeA
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 02:02:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 02:54:40 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or
> reserve. AFAIK, none of the
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 02:54:40 Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or
> > reserve. AFAIK, none of them access any global variables aside
> > from GC-related stuff
On Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 01:47:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or
reserve. AFAIK, none of them access any global variables aside
from GC-related stuff (and new is already allowed in pure
functions). All it would take to make them p
At present, assumeSafeAppend isn't pure - nor is capacity or reserve. AFAIK,
none of them access any global variables aside from GC-related stuff (and new
is already allowed in pure functions). All it would take to make them pure is
to mark the declarations for the C functions that they call pur
11 matches
Mail list logo