On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:20:21 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham St Jack wrote:
>> I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects
>> in a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change
>> the value of object references, which i
Graham St Jack wrote:
I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects in
a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change the
value of object references, which isn't allowed. I don't quite follow the
arguments that mean that this has to be the
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:12:33 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:31:33 -0400, Graham St Jack
> wrote:
>
>> I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects
>> in a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change
&
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Graham St Jack Wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:28:18 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
I agree that D lacks a mechanism to separate the object from it's
reference. Maybe syntax like the following could be used to
ap
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> > Graham St Jack Wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:28:18 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I agree that D lacks a mechanism to separate the object from it's
> >>> reference. Maybe syntax like the following could be used
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> > Graham St Jack Wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:28:18 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I agree that D lacks a mechanism to separate the object from it's
> >>> reference. Maybe syntax like the following could be used
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Graham St Jack Wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:28:18 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
I agree that D lacks a mechanism to separate the object from it's
reference. Maybe syntax like the following could be used to
apply the storage class to the object value, and not the
Graham St Jack Wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:28:18 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
>
>
> > I agree that D lacks a mechanism to separate the object from it's
> > reference. Maybe syntax like the following could be used to apply the
> > storage class to the object value, and not the reference va
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:31:33 -0400, Graham St Jack
wrote:
I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects in
a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change the
value of object references, which isn't allowed. I don't quite follow the
argu
ause:
* It presents different interfaces for different kinds of wrapped types.
* It doesn't let you access the wrapped object except via opDot.
My suggested workaround is perhaps a bit rough, but it does work. I would
like to hear from anyone who is using const and immutable objects in D2
who has something better, or has suggestions to improve my code.
Graham St Jack Wrote:
> I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects in
> a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change the
> value of object references, which isn't allowed. I don't quite follow the
> arguments that mean t
I have been trying (again) to start using const and immutable objects in
a project, and found I kept getting stuck with the need to change the
value of object references, which isn't allowed. I don't quite follow the
arguments that mean that this has to be the case, but I'm prep
12 matches
Mail list logo
