A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin)
difficult/impossible. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a bug
that's never come up.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:33:36 UTC, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first.
-oq, anyone? ;)
David
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
-oq, anyone? ;)
Whoops, forgot the link:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
David
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:33:35 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
> something.
>
> dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
>
> The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
> everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin)
> difficult/imposs
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
the object file
names to try and avoid collisions.
Well, the thing is in this case eve
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> > -oq, anyone? ;)
>
> Whoops, forgot the link:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
>
> David
If only one of the attempts to implement that option actually
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Then what happens when you have
> >
> > dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
>
> Good point.
>
> > Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
> >
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:44:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
> Then what happens when you have
>
> dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
> Regardle
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at
> once.
Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell it to use/generate the appropriate
directory structure. You already typically give it an output directory. It
wouldn'
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:05:40PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:33:35 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> > A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
> > something.
> >
> > dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
> >
> > The second module overwrites the first. This mak
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 16:08:20 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:05:40PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:33:35 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> > > A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
> > > something.
> > >
> > > dmd -c fo
Although I agree that sources and objects should be sperated there are some
benifits. All tools know where to look for the objects. And is not
dificult to keep out of scm. A great example of this is Haskell. To
compile an app you only need to specify the main file and it finds all the
included
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:15:37PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 16:08:20 H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > The real solution is that when creating object files, dmd should put
> > the .o files in the modules' respective subdirectories. I.e., it
> > should keep the path
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 16:28:45 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:15:37PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Yuck. Yuck. Source should _always_ be separated from object files.
> > It's incredibly messy otherwise.
>
> Not really. You just have .d's with their corresponding .o'
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:36:12PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 16:28:45 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:15:37PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > Yuck. Yuck. Source should _always_ be separated from object files.
> > > It's incredibly messy o
On 2012-02-22 22:37, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
-oq, anyone? ;)
Whoops, forgot the link:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
David
I've tried to implement that several times but something always fails on
Am 23.02.2012 00:03, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
>> Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at
>> once.
>
> Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell it to use/generate the
> appropriate
> directory structure. Yo
On 2012-02-22 23:42, Brad Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
-oq, anyone? ;)
Whoops, forgot the link:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
David
If only one of the attempts to
On 2012-02-22 23:05, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:33:35 Bernard Helyer wrote:
A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono
On 2012-02-22 23:43, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the ide
On 2012-02-22 23:33, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with the
object file
names to try and avoid collisi
On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at
once.
Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell it to use/generate the appropriate
directory structure. You already typica
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:06:54 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-02-22 23:05, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > If you're going to worry about modules when generating object files, then
> > you really should be putting the object files in the same directory
> > layout as the modules have. But that
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> >>Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at once.
> >
> >Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 21:28:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
>>Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it a
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 23:06:56 UTC, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
Did you not read what Jacob posted?
my.module.A.o
my_module_A.o
my_module.A.o
my.module_A.o
No conflicts.
Also, you can't have a package called module.
On 2012-02-24 00:06, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 21:28:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
>>Except DMD i
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 13:42:44 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-02-23 00:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
> >> Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at
> >> once.
> >
> > Then maybe there _should_ be a flag
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:33:35 +0100, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin) difficult/impossible. A
Be aware that if you use an archiver to put these files in a library you'll
overwrite one. The command to preserve path name that the archiver provides on
some OSes doesn't exist everywhere.
On Feb 25, 2012, at 7:09 AM, "Martin Nowak" wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:33:35 +0100, Bernard Helye
30 matches
Mail list logo
