On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 11:38:31 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
What's the best/standard way translating this to D?
One way is to use import expressions:
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
enum value = import("value").to!int();
void main()
{
static if (value < 100)
On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 22:20:39 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
I thing another way is to have the entire module a template and
instantiate
that template with necessary parameters. Although that means
one has to
have an additional namespace.
Mixin the template into the module scope?
http:
On Saturday, 24 November 2012 at 05:55:49 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
In case of WinAPI itself, which takes a dozen of preprocessor
definitions,
would you like a WinAPI binding, where you need to mix in the
WinAPI?
I believe the bindings on dsource use a sensible solution. It is
similar to wh
On 2012-11-23 12:38, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
2. I can't use static if because:
2.1. I can't define FOOBAR from outside of the package this code
will be in.
2.2. I can't include the definition of FOOBAR into the package
(like config.d) and expect it to be changed as necessary, because th
Nice idea, especially with the template to make things easier. Still it
looks ugly. Version identifiers and numbers (as well as debug identifiers
and numbers) serve a very good purpose (parametrizing modules), but they're
vastly incomplete. There's so much useful stuff that could be done if
module
I'd go one step forward to also allow UDAs on packages. This will be very
useful for conditionally compiling entire libraries, instead of manually
setting the same UDAs for every module in the package.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan <
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice
On 2012-11-27 08:22, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Nice idea, especially with the template to make things easier. Still it
looks ugly. Version identifiers and numbers (as well as debug
identifiers and numbers) serve a very good purpose (parametrizing
modules), but they're vastly incomplete. There's so m
On 2012-11-27 08:25, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I'd go one step forward to also allow UDAs on packages. This will be
very useful for conditionally compiling entire libraries, instead of
manually setting the same UDAs for every module in the package.
How would that work? You cannot declare a package
