Re: improving the D spec

2009-07-06 Thread Tim Matthews
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: http://www.jfbillingsley.com/dspec/ Nothing terribly pretty yet, and there's really only the Lexical section done, but if you'd like, I can get you write access to it. As well as anyone else who's interested. I plan on having are 'rationale' sections to explain why

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-30 Thread Christian Kamm
Leandro Lucarella wrote: Thank you for the great job. Following your example, I created a meta-bug for each category to easily keep track of them =) Thanks! I was not sure how to make the groupings permanent - and putting it directly into bugzilla is a good idea! Any distinction between '*'

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-30 Thread Christian Kamm
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: Nothing terribly pretty yet, and there's really only the Lexical section done, but if you'd like, I can get you write access to it. As well as anyone else who's interested. I plan on having are 'rationale' sections to explain why features are chosen, and

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-30 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Christian Kammkamm-incasoftw...@removethis.de wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: Nothing terribly pretty yet, and there's really only the Lexical section done, but if you'd like, I can get you write access to it.  As well as anyone else who's interested.  I plan

improving the D spec

2009-06-29 Thread Christian Kamm
In the wake of the recent 'state of D' articles, I've looked at the D1 spec bugs on bugzilla and grouped them by topic. I've also separated them into issues that probably need compiler changes (+) and bugs that might be resolved by a spec change (*). My plan is to go through the issues and to

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-29 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Christian Kammkamm-incasoftw...@removethis.de wrote: In the wake of the recent 'state of D' articles, I've looked at the D1 spec bugs on bugzilla and grouped them by topic. I've also separated them into issues that probably need compiler changes (+) and bugs

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-29 Thread Robert Clipsham
Christian Kamm wrote: In the wake of the recent 'state of D' articles, I've looked at the D1 spec bugs on bugzilla and grouped them by topic. I've also separated them into issues that probably need compiler changes (+) and bugs that might be resolved by a spec change (*). My plan is to go

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-29 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Christian Kamm, el 29 de junio a las 22:20 me escribiste: In the wake of the recent 'state of D' articles, I've looked at the D1 spec bugs on bugzilla and grouped them by topic. I've also separated them into issues that probably need compiler changes (+) and bugs that might be resolved by

Re: improving the D spec

2009-06-29 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Leandro Lucarella, el 29 de junio a las 22:46 me escribiste: Christian Kamm, el 29 de junio a las 22:20 me escribiste: In the wake of the recent 'state of D' articles, I've looked at the D1 spec bugs on bugzilla and grouped them by topic. I've also separated them into issues that