Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> I hide JavaScript behind CoffeeScript, makes it a bit more usable.
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
)
there's now a Javascript
On 2011-12-04 21:17, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
I hide JavaScript behind CoffeeScript, makes it a bit more usable.
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-la
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> Maybe you should take a look at SASS, it has if-statements, for-loops,
Yea, I've looked at it before (and like some of the ideas - their lighten,
darken,
etc. functions are nice and I intend to implement them myself as I find the
time - see color.d in that github page.)
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jbglgs$2no2$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I think CoffeeScript works really well, it's been around a while and it's
> the default way to handle JavaScript in Rails 3.1 and later versions (SASS
> is the default way of handling CSS).
That seems slightly stran
On 2011-12-04 21:40, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
Maybe you should take a look at SASS, it has if-statements, for-loops,
Yea, I've looked at it before (and like some of the ideas - their lighten,
darken,
etc. functions are nice and I intend to implement them myself as I find th
On 2011-12-05 07:59, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jbglgs$2no2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think CoffeeScript works really well, it's been around a while and it's
the default way to handle JavaScript in Rails 3.1 and later versions (SASS
is the default way of hand
Jacob Carlborg:
> I think they're good languages, regardless of the indent-syntax or not.
> CoffeeScript and Ruby share a couple of language features that I'm not
> sure if Python does:
>
> * Instance variables start with @ (shortcut for "this." in CS)
>
> * Functions can be called without par
Am 04.12.2011, 21:17 Uhr, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe
:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
)
there's now a JavascriptMacroExpander
On 2011-12-05 10:10, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 04.12.2011, 21:17 Uhr, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe
:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
)
th
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
> for e in arr
> # do something with the element "e"
Heh, I used to think that would work in regular Javascript,
since it does have a for(blah in something) form...
But in regular javascript, that only works on objects!
Marco Leise Wrote:
> This is really one of the largest shortcomings of the language that can
> not be explained with a simple design choice.
Aye. One of the newer versions adds a forEach member to the
array prototype, that works like this:
[1, 2, 3].forEach(function(element) { use element here;
On 2011-12-05 16:47, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
for e in arr
# do something with the element "e"
Heh, I used to think that would work in regular Javascript,
since it does have a for(blah in something) form...
But in regular javascript, that only works on objects!
Yeah, it
On 2011-12-05 16:53, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Marco Leise Wrote:
This is really one of the largest shortcomings of the language that can
not be explained with a simple design choice.
Aye. One of the newer versions adds a forEach member to the
array prototype, that works like this:
[1, 2, 3].forEach(
13 matches
Mail list logo
