On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 03:03:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/9/12 3:17 PM, Tove wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 07:03:35 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed
:-D
I just invented an absolutely wicked way of using alloca() in
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 03:03:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/9/12 3:17 PM, Tove wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 07:03:35 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed
:-D
I just invented an absolutely wicked way of using alloca() in
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 07:03:35 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed
:-D
I just invented an absolutely wicked way of using alloca() in the
parent context... unfortunately frame_size is static but with
some work, it's still an usable
I thought function default parameters need to be statically known...
isn't it the case?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Tove t...@fransson.se wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 07:03:35 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed :-D
I just
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 20:52:33 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I thought function default parameters need to be statically
known...
isn't it the case?
Nope – AFAIK you can also do something like (Foo param = new
Foo).
David
On 5/9/12 3:17 PM, Tove wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 07:03:35 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed :-D
I just invented an absolutely wicked way of using alloca() in the parent
context...
Yah, me too.
Cool! Thanks! I'l definitely check it out! I hope it's DDOCed :-D
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:29 AM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5/7/2012 12:08 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Wasn't there an allocator mechanism under development for phobos? I
remember there was a StackAllocator, that can
I'm working on dynamic memory layout manager. Simply put, it will
allow one to create and use struct types at run-time.
Normally, you create a struct at compile-time type by specifying an
ordered list of fields, each with its own type (basically a size) and
name.
You then access those fields by
On 07-05-2012 13:58, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I'm working on dynamic memory layout manager. Simply put, it will
allow one to create and use struct types at run-time.
Normally, you create a struct at compile-time type by specifying an
ordered list of fields, each with its own type (basically a
I can't use alloca, because the stack-based allocation will be done in
the constructor and alloca will free the memory as soon as the
constructor exists.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07-05-2012 13:58, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I'm working on
On 07-05-2012 14:37, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I can't use alloca, because the stack-based allocation will be done in
the constructor and alloca will free the memory as soon as the
constructor exists.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alex Rønne Petersenxtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07-05-2012
Basically I want what alloca does, but instead of considering the
constructor's scope, I want it to hand to the constructor call's
enclosing scope.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07-05-2012 14:37, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I can't use alloca,
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 13:36:02 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Basically I want what alloca does, but instead of considering
the constructor's scope, I want it to hand to the constructor
call's enclosing scope.
I think you'd need to modify the compiler for this, since alloca
is 'magical'.
I'd decrease ESP to allocate my space, but the problem arises when I
try to determine when should I increase it back where it was. Any
suggestions on how to do this using asm?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Mehrdad wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 13:36:02 UTC, Gor
Wasn't there an allocator mechanism under development for phobos? I
remember there was a StackAllocator, that can span for arbitrary
scopes. What's up with that?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Mehrdad wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 13:36:02 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
No idea, sorry. :\
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 16:08:42 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Wasn't there an allocator mechanism under development for
phobos? I
remember there was a StackAllocator, that can span for arbitrary
scopes. What's up with that?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Mehrdad
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 16:03:15 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 13:36:02 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Basically I want what alloca does, but instead of considering
the constructor's scope, I want it to hand to the constructor
call's enclosing scope.
I think you'd need to modify
That won't do. This is way too ugly, considering, that it needs to be
heavily used in user code. I'm thinking an inline ASM solution, but
can't figure out when to deallocate.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Arne a...@linux.nu wrote:
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 16:03:15 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On
On 5/7/2012 12:08 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Wasn't there an allocator mechanism under development for phobos? I
remember there was a StackAllocator, that can span for arbitrary
scopes. What's up with that?
I wrote one. It's at https://github.com/dsimcha/TempAlloc . It hasn't
been accepted
19 matches
Mail list logo
