On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 20:19:49 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 14:01:32 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
I don't think I'd interpret these two names as having the same
functionality in the first place. I'd probably learn their
equivalence completely by accident and only remember
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 14:01:32 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Proposed new name: withExtension
I feel this fails the litmus you established before: "These
funct
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Proposed new name: withExtension
I feel this fails the litmus you established before: "These
functions have the same functionality, but one of them is eager
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:51:06 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Proposed new name: withExtension
+1
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Proposed new name: withExtension
I'm fine with withExtension. Certainly, I don't think that
anything starting with "set" really makes sense given that it's a
lazy operation.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 23:13:11 UTC, Mike wrote:
`setExtensionLazy`
Mike
I really don't like the Lazy suffix. Ignoring the issue of making
things somewhat uglier solely for the purpose of ambiguity, it
also leads to confusion regarding whether you should be invoking
foo or fooLazy. Is
`setExtensionLazy`
Rationale
* sorts well with `setExtension` for tooling
* implies that it is related to `setExtension` in some way
* at-a-glance disambiguates it from `setExtension` with a clue as
to how it is differrent
The disadvantage is that its a little long, but that's due to the
leng
post. I'll start.
Rationale:
std.path.setExt is the lazy (range-based) version of
std.path.setExtension, thus the only difference in the name is
that one is abbreviated, and the other is not. As there is no
consistent convention that abbreviated names are lazy, it is not
memorable whic
