Hello bearophile,
BCS:
Because you complained I added the other two, but because I think
they are silly I make it so you can switch them on and off (they are
placed under a "version(FullSI)").
What's the definition of "silly SI units"?
Base SI units that are or can be defined in terms of
BCS:
> Because you complained I added the other two, but because I think they are
> silly I make it so you can switch them on and off (they are placed under
> a "version(FullSI)").
What's the definition of "silly SI units"?
Bye,
bearophile
Hello SiegeLord,
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that
I recognised. The current vertion can have a new unit added as a
single line of code.
SI has
Hello SiegeLord,
Avogadro's number is not know precisely, and because of that very
reason the unit of mole is used. It is not even known precisely enough
to fill out the 15 digits of precision that double type provides,
which just makes it unacceptable as a hard-coded constant (unlike say,
pi).
Actually, nevermind on the precision arguments, precision doesn't work like
that. There may be other arguments for natural units that I can't think of now,
though...
-SiegeLord
Simen kjaeraas Wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:58 +0100, BCS wrote:
>
> > Hello SiegeLord,
> >
> >> BCS Wrote:
> >>
> Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
> the more obscure physical units.
>
> >>> My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:58 +0100, BCS wrote:
Hello SiegeLord,
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that
I recognised. The current vertion can have a
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:58 +0100, BCS wrote:
Hello SiegeLord,
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that
I recognised. The current vertion can have a
Hello Andrei,
SiegeLord wrote:
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that
I recognised. The current vertion can have a new unit added as a
single line of
Hello SiegeLord,
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as well as
the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that
I recognised. The current vertion can have a new unit added as a
single line of code.
SI has
SiegeLord wrote:
BCS Wrote:
Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as
well as the more obscure physical units.
My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that I recognised.
The current vertion can have a new unit added as a single line of code.
SI has 7
BCS Wrote:
> > Also all of the imperial units that I don't care about, as
> > well as the more obscure physical units.
>
> My lib has every SI unit I could fine and all the units I found that I
> recognised.
> The current vertion can have a new unit added as a single line of code.
SI has 7 bas
First:
I've updated my units type to d2.0 and cleaned it up a bit.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/units/si2.d
I'm offering this for inclusion in Phobos and/or Tango and am willing to
license it as needed to make that work.
If anyone shows any interest at all I'll star
13 matches
Mail list logo