Re: year to date pull statistics (2016-07-09)

2016-07-13 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 266 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 137 created closed delta 2016-07-10 - today 25 24 -1 2016-07-03 - 2016-07-09 75 97 22 2016-06-26 - 2016-07-02 91 89 -2 2016-06-19 - 2016-06-25 44 24-20

Re: year to date pull statistics (2016-06-25)

2016-06-30 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
On 06/29/2016 08:58 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: total open: 295 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 159 created closed delta 2016-06-26 - today 47 37-10 2016-06-19 - 2016-06-25 44 24-20 2016-06-12 - 2016-06-18 37

Re: year to date pull statistics (2016-06-25)

2016-06-29 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 295 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 159 created closed delta 2016-06-26 - today 47 37-10 2016-06-19 - 2016-06-25 44 24-20 2016-06-12 - 2016-06-18 37 48 11 2016-06-05 - 2016-06-11 40 42 2

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-05-28)

2016-06-02 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 18:36:02 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 23:48:00 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: [...] You should take Jack Stouffer in dlang ;) . Perso I think that in the phobos the problem is that the people who should manage it are not enough available. I am

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-05-28)

2016-06-02 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 23:48:00 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: total open: 284 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 142 created closed delta 2016-05-29 - today 25 25 0 2016-05-22 - 2016-05-28 46 34-12 2016-05-15 - 2016-05-21 40

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-05-28)

2016-05-31 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 23:48:00 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: total open: 252 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 106 ... total open: 284 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 142 Ouch - that's a huge spike! What happened to the idea from dconf to automatically assing PR managers

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-05-28)

2016-05-31 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 284 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 142 created closed delta 2016-05-29 - today 25 25 0 2016-05-22 - 2016-05-28 46 34-12 2016-05-15 - 2016-05-21 40 36 -4 2016-05-08 - 2016-05-14 82 55-27

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-05-07)

2016-05-10 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 252 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 106 created closed delta 2016-05-08 - today 46 35-11 2016-05-01 - 2016-05-07 37 59+22 2016-04-24 - 2016-04-30 74 85+11 2016-04-17 - 2016-04-23 51 58 +7

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-04-30)

2016-05-04 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 265 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 110 created closed delta 2016-05-01 - today 16 14 -2 2016-04-24 - 2016-04-30 74 85+11 2016-04-17 - 2016-04-23 51 58 +7 2016-04-10 - 2016-04-16 52 58 +6

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-04-25 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
The astute observer might notice that the past results aren't 100% constant (and that I skipped a week): 1) I had a sign flip issue for april in the delta column. That column is: closed - created. 2) some past weeks have slightly different closed counts than previous emails. That can occur

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-04-09)

2016-04-11 Thread Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 11 April 2016 at 20:44:20 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: 2016-04-03 - 2016-04-09 64 45+19 Ouch, slow week for reviewing I guess.

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-04-09)

2016-04-11 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 270 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 100 created closed delta 2016-04-10 - today 9 10 -1 2016-04-03 - 2016-04-09 64 45+19 2016-03-27 - 2016-04-02 65 60 +5 2016-03-20 - 2016-03-26 65 63 +2

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-04-02)

2016-04-04 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 270 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 100 created closed delta 2016-04-03 - today 15 10 +5 2016-03-27 - 2016-04-02 65 60 +5 2016-03-20 - 2016-03-26 65 63 +2 2016-03-13 - 2016-03-19 44 51 -7

Re: year to date pull statistics (week ending 2016-03-26)

2016-03-28 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
total open: 264 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 93 created closed delta 2016-03-27 - today 20 16 +4 2016-03-20 - 2016-03-26 65 63 +2 2016-03-13 - 2016-03-19 44 51 -7 2016-03-06 - 2016-03-12 41 46 +5

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-25 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 25 March 2016 at 14:50:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: I think the problem is that we're horribly short of manpower here. Clearly. The D community is growing: http://forum.dlang.org/post/nbnl53$lb0$1...@digitalmars.com Unless the ranks of leadership are grown to match, it is

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-25 Thread Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 25 March 2016 at 14:50:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: tl;dr: We need more Phobos reviewers, and more importantly, more committers. Many more, IMO. I've noticed recently that there has been an increase in the number of reviewers, which is a good sign, but not enough of them have been

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-25 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:11:15PM +, tsbockman via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 15:33:23 UTC, PmLk wrote: > >On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 00:20:56 UTC, tsbockman wrote: > >>It's to the point where I feel kind of guilty about opening new pull > >>requests. > > > >You

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-22 Thread ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
On 22.03.2016 16:33, PmLk wrote: You shouldn't. It's not your fault if the authors let their PR sleeping during 6 months without maintaining them. If you look at the tail of the queue, 60% of the PR don't even pass anymore. Unfortunately, authors are often not the problem. We can't expect

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-22 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 15:33:23 UTC, PmLk wrote: On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 00:20:56 UTC, tsbockman wrote: It's to the point where I feel kind of guilty about opening new pull requests. You shouldn't. It's not your fault if the authors let their PR sleeping during 6 months without

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-22 Thread PmLk via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 00:20:56 UTC, tsbockman wrote: On Monday, 21 March 2016 at 21:25:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: But then Dicebot quit working on Phobos, and I got busy, and things just spiralled out of control again. On topic, I do notice the queue has gotten rather long... I've

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-21 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 21 March 2016 at 21:25:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: Let X be the set not defined by this sentence... [OT] Your signature line is trying to make my brain explode. Last year Dicebot, myself, and a bunch of others managed to get the queue down to the high 30's / low 40's, or

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-21 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:59:29PM -0700, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Another week, so another update to the pull statistics for the D-P-L > dmd, runtime, and phobos repositories. There's been a bit of progress > chipping away at the queue, though there's still a long way to go. > The

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-21 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
Another week, so another update to the pull statistics for the D-P-L dmd, runtime, and phobos repositories. There's been a bit of progress chipping away at the queue, though there's still a long way to go. The number of open phobos pulls has grown quite a bit over the last few weeks and

Re: year to date pull statistics

2016-03-14 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
Updating last week's email, the pull statistics for the D-P-L dmd, runtime, and phobos repositories: total open: 263 created since 2016-01-01 and still open: 82 created closed delta 2016-03-13 - today 8 10 +2 2016-03-06 - 2016-13-12 41 46

year to date pull statistics

2016-03-07 Thread Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
A topic that rolls around periodically is the number of open pulls and or the frequency at which a pull is 'ignored' (no, it's not ignored, it's just lost in the noise). I've dug up some rate of change statistics for the year to date for pulls to the D-P-L master branches of the dmd, druntime,