On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:22:25 +0300
Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Yes you do, this is economy 101.
I guess that's some course number, maybe in USA.
ah, that means basics of ..., something from the first semester of
the first year of the given discipline.
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:23:17 +
IgorStepanov via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
What does the NO_INTERIOR flag?
it stops GC to acknowledge pointers inside allocated area as anchors.
i.e. if there is no pointer to the head (first address) of allocated
memory, it is assumed to
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 01:56:17 +
IgorStepanov via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 23:49:00 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:23:17 +
IgorStepanov via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
What
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:59:52 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
A lexer that takes zero terminated input is a lot easier to write
and make fast than one that use length.
that's why warp is faster than cpp? ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:09:00 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 22:00:10 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
that's why warp is faster than cpp? ;-)
Which implementation of cpp?
gcc implementation, afair. it's slowness was the reason
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:22:42 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Nah, if you know that the file ends with zero then you can build
an efficient finite automata as a classifier.
FSA code is a fsckn mess. either adding dependency of external tool and
alot of messy output to
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:33:51 +
FrankLike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
If you migrate your projct from x86 to x64,you will find the
length is error,you must modify it ,such as:
int i= (something).length
to
size_t i = (something).length
but now ,'int' is
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:24:16 +
FrankLike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
drop your C.
auto len = smth.length;
works ok for both x86 and x86_64 (don't know what x64 is).
Many excellent projects such as dfl,dgui,tango, many 'length'
which type is 'int' or
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:41:18 +
FrankLike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Many excellent projects such as dfl,dgui,tango, many 'length'
which type is 'int' or 'uint',they are D's,many people like
it.but they should migrate to 64 bit.So if 'length' type is
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:59:04 +
David Eagen via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Isn't the purpose of size_t is to be large enough to address all
available memory? A negative value is not only too small but
doesn't make sense when discussing lengths.
Correctness
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:33:42 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Unfortunately this syntax is not yet supported, for unknown
reasons:
foreach (; 0 .. a.length)
{
somework();
}
the same as for `foreach (auto n; ...)` -- cosmetic changes are not
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:03:34 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
No! No! No! This is completely wrong. Unsigned does not mean
positive. It means no sign, and therefore wrapping
semantics.
eg length - 4 0, if length is 2.
Weird consequence: using subtraction
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:33:17 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
D doesn't allow construction from a different type with the `Type
name = value;` syntax. Try this:
har-har... here comes the power of the dark side!
struct S {
bool filler; // just in case, to avoid
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:33:21 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
No. Signed types do not *wrap*. They *overflow* if their range is
exceeded.
same for unsigned ints.
This is not the same thing. Overflow is always an error.
And the compiler could insert checks to
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:44:09 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Ah, right, it _does_ work with explicitly defined constructors.
Maybe GValue doesn't have those?
that may be true. i'm too lazy to look at the sources, and it seems
to me that it's very easy to miss the
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:47:50 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
yes. besides, there is no such thing as negative length, so
it's
somewhat... weird to use signed integer for length.
A length can certainly be negative. Just as a bank balance can be
negative.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:04:15 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't know what you mean. For unsigned ints, carry is not an
error. That's the whole point of unsigned!
this *may* be not a error. it depends of what programmer wants.
This is the job of the
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:02:49 -0700
David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/19/14, 6:57 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:47:50 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
If I have two pencils of length 10 cm
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:40:39 +
Araq via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Here are some more opinions:
http://critical.eschertech.com/2010/04/07/danger-unsigned-types-used-here/
trying to illustrate something with obviously wrong code is very funny.
the whole article then
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:10:55 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
BTW, granted the 0x7FFF problems exhibit the bugs less
often, but paradoxically this can make the bug worse, because
then it only gets found much, much later in supposedly tested
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:23:01 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
C/C++ programmers disagree:
http://critical.eschertech.com/2010/04/07/danger-unsigned-types-used-here/
Why do you think they can't handle signed integers?
being C programmer i disagree that author
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:28:37 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/20/2014 7:52 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What *could* be improved, is the prevention of obvious mistakes in
*mixing* signed and unsigned types. Right now, D allows code
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:31:23 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
bearophile wrote in message news:lkcltlokangpzzdzz...@forum.dlang.org...
From my experience in coding in D they are far more unlikely than
sign-related bugs of array lengths.
Here's a
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:39:42 +
monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
D has phenomenal meta programming possibilities, and I see more
and more templates taking more and more parameters. So I thought
to myself, why not have a template builder pattern?
i did
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:17:06 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This bug can manifest itself for arrays whose length (in elements) is
2^30 or greater (roughly a billion elements)
How often does that happen in practice?
once in almost ten years is too
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:37:39 +
Araq via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
broken is not a black-white thing. Works most of the time
surely is much more useful than doesn't work. Otherwise you
would throw away your phone the first time you get a busy signal.
works most of the
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:55:45 +
FrankLike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 13:59:08 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
any code which does something like `if (a-b 0)` is broken. it
Modify it:
https://github.com/D-Programming
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:31:13 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Would you agree that that would break a substantial amount of correct D
code? -- Andrei
i don't think that code with possible int wrapping and `auto` is
correct, so the answer is no. bad
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:38:26 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You see, if you don't use a BigNum for everything than you will always
have hidden bugs, be it with int, uint or whatever.
why do you believe that i'm not aware of overflows and don't
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:08:54 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
What about:
uint x;
auto z = x - 1;
?
here z must be `long`. and for `ulong` compiler must emit error.
What if x==uint.max?
nothing bad, long is perfectly able to
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:36:53 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/21/14, 11:29 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:31:23 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
bearophile wrote
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:59:13 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/21/2014 6:03 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:28:37 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/20/2014 7:52 AM, H. S
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:52:29 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
So 'auto' has different type rules for expressions than anywhere else in D?
Consider:
void foo(T)(T a) { ... }
if (x - 1) foo(x - 1);
if (auto a = x - 1) foo(a);
and
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:45:11 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On 11/21/14 8:57 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:31:13 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Would you agree
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:35:31 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
'auto' doesn't mean break my code if I refactor out expressions into
temporaries.
this can be easily avoided: just don't use `auto` for refactoring. i'm
still thinking about `auto` as any type
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 03:09:59 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 09:47:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 09:37:50 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I thought everyone hated foreach_reverse!
I dislike
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:54:58 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
In D, 1u - 2u 0u. This is defined behaviour, not an overflow.
p.s. sorry, of course this is not and overflow. this is underflow.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:54:58 +
Don via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
In D, 1u - 2u 0u. This is defined behaviour, not an overflow.
this *is* overflow. D just has overflow result defined.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:36:02 +0100
Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You can just use a struct and D's phenomenal compile time
programming possibilities. ;)
heh. thank you, with `alias` and function instead of struct my
compile-time formatted writter now works
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:07:00 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Slackware 14.1. I've been a Slackware user for a long time and I
still find it less unbearable than the alternatives, but it often
annoys me.
ah, now i understand why i like your code so
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:06:01 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
xterm is one example. I basically like it but it is ugly and
stupid so needs a few fixes. As such, I maintain my own private
fork of it.
ah, terminal emulators... i ended writing my own
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:20:37 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
The other part of my terminal emulator was also a gnu screen
replacement. I got it to the point where it worked pretty well... but
not well enough to break my inertia toward good old screen.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 03:51:58 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
BTW @nogc should have an escape hatch at least for assert(0,
allocate_a_message). The program is dying anyway, at least let me
conveniently format a descriptive error message.
hey, but we
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 05:12:51 +
weaselcat via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
@Adam D. Ruppe : Check out st from suckless, it was made because
xterm is unmaintainable. Also, consider a distro from this
century ;)
heh, that was the base of my own terminal emulator. just
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 06:50:59 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
However, I'm looking forward to voice recognition and some sort
of hand gesture input becoming the dominant interfaces in the
coming years. Those will be even easier to use than anything so
far,
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:58:32 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
i bet that such intefaces will be widespread, but faster and
more
usable? nope. i can type much faster than i'm talking, i can
edit what
i typed and... and just won't buy it. but yes, they
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:46:29 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 at 20:09:04 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:58:32 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
i bet
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:17:34 +0300
Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Okay, so I'm prepping up a SCons build of Phobos. It comes along rather
nicely, I've replicated most of posix.mak paraphernalia in ~150 LOC that
does work for both Windows and Linux, the
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:39:37 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
makefiles can then be shipped as part of the source distribution, but
they need not (and probably should not!) be in the git tree.
hope this will not happen soon. i used to build DMD from git
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:52:01 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I brought up using voice recognition as a general computer
interface but, of course, everybody here only focused on the
niche case of coding. :) I was talking about using it for
everything:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:08:01 +
CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just wanted to make a couple of comments on 'voice activated
coding'.
My typing speed is not the bottleneck in my coding, it is the
speed at which I reason about the problem at hand.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:23:12 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:06:01PM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:08:01 +
CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:34:20 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 19:16:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
ah, yes. i don't think about that, but you are right: typing
for two hours is ok
I don't really agree, if I
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:34:20 +
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 19:16:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
ah, yes. i don't think about that, but you are right: typing
for two hours is ok
I don't really agree, if I
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:00:35 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
etc. I am not saying to remove them, just make them downstream
like GNU does, not part of regression tested D core. If I wanted
to use a big lang I'd do CLR or JRE.
if i wanted some crippled language
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:33:51 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just for fun, I've decided to try and get MicroEmacs in D added to the dub
registry. The last time it compiled was 2 years ago.
I wound up with at least a dozen references to Phobos names
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:43:16 -0600
Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/28/14, 5:39 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
oh, wait... such tool was suggested years ago and has no signs of
official blessing until this year's summer! and now it can't fix
two
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:04:26 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Walter Bright wrote in message news:m5b5ma$1hfj$1...@digitalmars.com...
Can't tell users to do that. It's not reasonable.
I don't see why not.
they will lose all the fun figuring out
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 01:39:44 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Walter Bright:
Just for fun, I've decided to try and [...]
There's a pull in need of some love, I'd like to see this in D:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3615
it needs
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:55:21 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This is more of an Ubuntu-y issue, but I'm having trouble getting it to link
with ncurses. This used to work:
cc $(LDFLG) -o med $(OBJ) -l :libncurses.so.5 -l phobos2 -l pthread -l m
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:08:27 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hmm. Did you install libncurses5-dev (or libncursesw5-dev)? If not, try
`apt-get install libncurses5-dev` (or libncursesw5-dev as appropriate).
Otherwise, try -lncurses5 or -lncursesw5, perhaps?
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:15:30 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:12:05AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 01:39:44 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Walter Bright
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 02:59:05 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Speculation without measurement. But I'll have you know my usage
of D has declined significantly because it is missing features I
want/need. It is also for this reason that I have not advocated
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:29 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/28/2014 7:22 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
same for me. i was gently pushing our development team towards D (heh,
and i'm in position to do that) but now i put a veto on D (yet
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:03:44 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
What I don't agree with are changing names of things that just cause needless
frustration, and are, as I tactlessly put it, an illusion of progress.
it seems to me that you are very pragmatic
dammit, my English sux even worse when i trying to say something
important...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:41:45 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/28/2014 6:08 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hmm. Did you install libncurses5-dev (or libncursesw5-dev)? If not, try
`apt-get install libncurses5-dev` (or libncursesw5-dev as
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:41:45 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 11/28/2014 6:08 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hmm. Did you install libncurses5-dev (or libncursesw5-dev)? If not, try
`apt-get install libncurses5-dev` (or libncursesw5-dev as
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:00:49 +
Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 29 November 2014 at 00:20:38 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
I think @disabled with a custom message would be perfect for
this. static assert only works for templates.
We just
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:28:00 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
ketmar:
and then it will rot in bugzilla forever.
Not necessarily. Some things rot there, but I've seen hundreds of
nice patches being merged.
this one is not pre-approved, so it will not
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:24:45 +0300
Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
python to exe tools.
WINE? oh, noes! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:01:34 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 03:03:37PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
Keeping around a deprecated alias translating the old symbol to the
new one is a good approach. For a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:00:09 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
// mymod.d
module mymod;
struct S {
// Now everyone is happy, right...?
import std.range : isInputRange;
void method(R)(R range)
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:55:34 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hmm... actually, this gives me an idea. What if we implement a little
syntactic sugar for this in the compiler? Say:
scope import std.conv ... ;
scope import std.format ... ;
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 17:33:09 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:11:52PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 12/2/14 6:28 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Technically, you *can* do that, but it's a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:18:26 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:11:54AM +, bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote:
sdvcn:
void ac(int aa)
{
}
void ac(void *a2)
{
}
int main(string[] argv)
{
auto v = ac;
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:40:45 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:31:11AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:18:26 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
[...]
How do you
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:24:13 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP69
Despite its length, this is a fairly simple proposal. It adds the missing
semantics for the 'scope' storage class in order to make it possible to pass
a
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:04:07 +
eles via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 10:00:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/4/2014 1:51 AM, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 09:25:11 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:15:22 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:10:52AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:55:34 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hmm... actually
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:15:22 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:10:52AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:55:34 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hmm... actually
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:55:34 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This seems acceptable only if the compiler switch -scope
implies functions to be @safe by default and @system on request,
because currently lot of D programmers don't apply annotations
like
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:12:48 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Twitter has some real value for the humanity.
( /me eats his cigarette )
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:47:53 +
Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It's an argument for Java over Python specifically but a bit more
general in reality. This stood out for me:
!…other languages like D and Go are too new to bet my work on.
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:04:39 +
Baz via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Attack me on the content of:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Coming_From/Delphi
typo:
type ISome = interfaca
type TSomething = classs(TThing, ISome)
also, it's worth noting that Delphi's IFDEF/ENDIF
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:47:45 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.2688.1417735514.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
What would you suggest we do?
Write a build script in D?
+1.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:10:18 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This way, the programmer not only gets the benefit of attributes without
actually having to explicitly use them, but the language designers can
also add many more attributes than you'd ever want
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:22:30 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:39:07AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
also, it's worth noting that Delphi's IFDEF/ENDIF completely ignores
everything inbetwee if condition is false
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:24:26 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/4/2014 5:32 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://www.teamten.com/lawrence/writings/java-for-everything.html
i didn't read the article, but i bet that this is just another article
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 02:39:49 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 13:48:04 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
It's an argument for Java over Python specifically but a bit
more
general in reality. This stood out for
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:03:59 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/4/2014 6:47 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
and what i also can't grok is test-driven developement. ah, we spent
alot of time writing that tests that we can't even run 'cause we
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:22:03 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Well, his choice may make sense, but I see no connection between
pet projects and proprietary paid work. They can't share code.
hm. but they can. my proprietary paid projects sharing alot of code
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:41:57 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 08:34:18 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
'cause it's much easier to simply use tested and familiar
library than to write brand new one.
Why
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:56:42 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 02:47:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
yes, i know about doxygen, unittesting frameworks and so on.
somehow
they never works for me. ah, those tools
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:07:23 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 08:56:03 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
my customers paying me for making the work done, not for
experimenting and researching.
They pay you to make
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:53:10 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Now is the right time to confess. I hardly ever use unit tests
although it's included (and encouraged) in D. Why? When I write
new code I unit test as I go along, with
debug writefln(result %s,
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:34:20 +0300
Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
05-Dec-2014 04:47, Daniel Murphy пишет:
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.2688.1417735514.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
What would you suggest we
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 07:54:32 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 6 December 2014 at 01:31:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 20:43:03 UTC, paulo pinto wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 20:25:49 UTC, Walter Bright
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:43:56 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Easy, the meetings get scheduled with each developer getting a
module for review.
Those developers then print the code and get some days for review
until the meeting.
The meeting takes
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 20:22:12 +
bitwise via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a mixin, which can mix a class into any module. At
compile time, I will know the name of the class, it's base class,
and that it is at global scope in some module.
Is there any
501 - 600 of 3410 matches
Mail list logo
