Re: dmd 1.047 and 2.032 releases

2009-09-07 Thread Don
Walter Bright wrote: Don wrote: Oh. And the D1 spec doesn't disallow inline asm in CTFE. But CTFE asm is Not Going To Happen. I think that eventually we can get all of SafeD to work in CTFE, but inline asm isn't part of SafeD! SafeD doesn't appear to be properly defined in the spec. And ce

Re: dmd 1.047 and 2.032 releases

2009-09-07 Thread Walter Bright
Don wrote: Walter Bright wrote: Don wrote: Oh. And the D1 spec doesn't disallow inline asm in CTFE. But CTFE asm is Not Going To Happen. I think that eventually we can get all of SafeD to work in CTFE, but inline asm isn't part of SafeD! SafeD doesn't appear to be properly defined in the

Re: dmd 1.047 and 2.032 releases

2009-09-07 Thread Robert Clipsham
Walter Bright wrote: This will probably be the last OSX 10.5 release, the next should be 10.6. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.047.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.032.zip Many thanks to the n

Re: dmd 1.047 and 2.032 releases

2009-09-07 Thread Jason House
Robert Clipsham Wrote: > You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple > merge to get it working with ldc ;) > > I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, ... Does this mean an official D2 LDC will be coming out shortly?

Re: dmd 1.047 and 2.032 releases

2009-09-07 Thread Robert Clipsham
Jason House wrote: Robert Clipsham Wrote: You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple merge to get it working with ldc ;) I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, ... Does this mean an official D2 LDC will be coming out shortly? Unlikely, sorry. L