Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge project for it a few minutes ago, I'll also open a
dsource project to link to
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge project for it a few minutes ago, I'll also open a
dsource project to link to the sf one in the following days.
At first I tried to code it in D using wxD but soon found out the
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge project for it a few minutes ago, I'll also open
a
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if
something broke.
You're testing, is everything
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:15:09 +0300, Jeremie Pelletier jerem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:22:42 +0300, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:22:42 +0300, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge
grauzone wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge project for it a few minutes ago, I'll also open
a dsource
Nick B wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Nick B wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these past weeks!
Among other things, I started writing an IDE for D from scratch and
opened a SourceForge project for it a few
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:15:09 +0300, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:22:42 +0300, Jeremie Pelletier
jerem...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup, I've been
quite busy these
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if
something broke.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d for
anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing things, people
will be using something different for good.
too bad
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
It's been some time since I last posted to this newsgroup,
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d for
anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing things, people
will be using something different for good.
too bad
I really don't think so, the very purpose of this IDE I'm developing
Nick B wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
[snip]
I really don't think so, the very purpose of this IDE I'm developing
is to make D easier to use and develop large scale projects with.
The only thing still in the way of using D with graphical applications
right now is the
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
things, people will be using something different for good. too bad
I really don't think so, the very
Lutger wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
things, people will be using something different for good. too bad
I really don't think so, the
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:13:39PM -0500, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
I wasn't aware of it, this is great news!
Aye :)
I have to say, having an IDE available as a dws app would be several kinds
of awesome. Imagine running it on a central server and letting random people
connect* and use it for
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d for
anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing things, people
will be using something different for good.
too bad
+1
Totally agreed
Why don't you post on d.D.ide?
hasenj wrote:
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
things, people will be using something different for good.
too bad
+1
Totally agreed
I really like that Adam and
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
Lutger wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
what a pityful sate d is in. this probably shows, that you can't use d
for anything serious and by the time you guys are through discussing
things, people will be using something different for good. too
22 matches
Mail list logo
