"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.vlbmgmt2o7c...@korden-pc...
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> Found this with google alert:
>>
>> http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I used D to
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Found this with google alert:
http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/
Andrei
I used D to code for my PSP almost two years ago with these tools (GDC/D1):
http://forums.qj.net/psp-development-forum/14
Found this with google alert:
http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/
Andrei
git and gui? Come on...
Have you seen this: http://www.syntevo.com/smartgit/index.html ?
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in
>> the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you
>> come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for
>> the same res
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:33:54 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger
> wrote:
>
>> The only true advantage that Git has over Mercurial is the staging
>> area, and even that is a two edged sword: IMO it should not be
>> enabled by default since it helps people to lose data. And the
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:26 +0300, Russel Winder
wrote:
Any FOSS project allows this, you just want to use a hosting site.
Launchpad and BitBucket behave like GitHub in this respect -- I don't
know about Gitorious but I suspect it is the same.
I would expect nothing less. Human approval of
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:45:08 +0300, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in
the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you
come from another VCS like SVN: you can use t
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:40:03 +0300, Russel Winder
wrote:
For personal individual working GitHub is fine. However, as far as I
know, it has no notion of team. Launchpad has both the notion of
personal and of team. For uncontrolled FOSS this perhaps doesn't
matter, but it makes it a lot easi
On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in
the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you
come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for
the same results on the local repository a
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:54:31 +0100
>> "Russel" == Russel Winder wrote:
Russel> Moving to any of Bazaar, Mercurial or Git would be a huge step
Russel> forward for any FOSS project currently using Subversion.
+1
Russel> Monotone and Darcs would be a big risk because Bazaar,
Russel> Mercurial a
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:33:40 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Don't forget drivers. Half the time it seems like there isn't a single
hardware manufacturer that actually knows what they're doing when it
comes
to writing Windows drivers.
Good point. I wonder if Linux allowing proprietary/closed
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vk9y2yhztuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev
> wrote:
>
>> A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS
>> is so horrible.
>
> For what it's worth, I never had any pro
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 17:25 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[ . . . ]
> project where community involvement is important. For example, I think
> that moving DMD/Phobos/DRuntime from SVN to Bazaar/Monotone/DARCS would be
> a very bad idea (and I think that GitHub's featureset would fit D's
>
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:56 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[ . . . ]
> It's not really about Git, it's about GitHub:
Actually, it is about your use model of GitHub.
> 1. Repo creation is instant, doesn't need to go through a human approval
> process, etc. (big turn-off from DSource, SourceF
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:02 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:42:32 +0300, Russel Winder
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:20 -0700, Bill Baxter wrote:
> >> I'm not a huge fan of Bazaar :-p ,
> >
> > Hummm... May I ask why?
>
> Could someone please explain to me w
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS
is so horrible.
For what it's worth, I never had any problems with my Windows install -
the only time I reinstalled was when I upgraded to newer versions
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:26:32 +0300, Gour wrote:
What about 'choice' or maybe we should move to the OS used by majority
of people where re-installation is very common troubleshooting
procedure?
That's a bad analogy. A good analogy is writing software only for Linux,
because the major OS is s
18 matches
Mail list logo