Re: MinPSPW supports D

2010-10-28 Thread Nick Sabalausky
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:op.vlbmgmt2o7c...@korden-pc... > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu > wrote: > >> Found this with google alert: >> >> http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/ >> >> >> Andrei > > I used D to

Re: MinPSPW supports D

2010-10-28 Thread Denis Koroskin
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Found this with google alert: http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/ Andrei I used D to code for my PSP almost two years ago with these tools (GDC/D1): http://forums.qj.net/psp-development-forum/14

MinPSPW supports D

2010-10-28 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
Found this with google alert: http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/ Andrei

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Uno
git and gui? Come on... Have you seen this: http://www.syntevo.com/smartgit/index.html ?

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: >> Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in >> the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you >> come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for >> the same res

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:33:54 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger > wrote: > >> The only true advantage that Git has over Mercurial is the staging >> area, and even that is a two edged sword: IMO it should not be >> enabled by default since it helps people to lose data. And the

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:26 +0300, Russel Winder wrote: Any FOSS project allows this, you just want to use a hosting site. Launchpad and BitBucket behave like GitHub in this respect -- I don't know about Gitorious but I suspect it is the same. I would expect nothing less. Human approval of

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:45:08 +0300, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you come from another VCS like SVN: you can use t

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:40:03 +0300, Russel Winder wrote: For personal individual working GitHub is fine. However, as far as I know, it has no notion of team. Launchpad has both the notion of personal and of team. For uncontrolled FOSS this perhaps doesn't matter, but it makes it a lot easi

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On 27/10/2010 22:33, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for the same results on the local repository a

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Gour
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:54:31 +0100 >> "Russel" == Russel Winder wrote: Russel> Moving to any of Bazaar, Mercurial or Git would be a huge step Russel> forward for any FOSS project currently using Subversion. +1 Russel> Monotone and Darcs would be a big risk because Bazaar, Russel> Mercurial a

Re: [OTx2] Windows

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:33:40 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Don't forget drivers. Half the time it seems like there isn't a single hardware manufacturer that actually knows what they're doing when it comes to writing Windows drivers. Good point. I wonder if Linux allowing proprietary/closed

Re: [OTx2] Windows

2010-10-28 Thread Nick Sabalausky
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message news:op.vk9y2yhztuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net... > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev > wrote: > >> A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS >> is so horrible. > > For what it's worth, I never had any pro

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 17:25 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: [ . . . ] > project where community involvement is important. For example, I think > that moving DMD/Phobos/DRuntime from SVN to Bazaar/Monotone/DARCS would be > a very bad idea (and I think that GitHub's featureset would fit D's >

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:56 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: [ . . . ] > It's not really about Git, it's about GitHub: Actually, it is about your use model of GitHub. > 1. Repo creation is instant, doesn't need to go through a human approval > process, etc. (big turn-off from DSource, SourceF

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:02 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:42:32 +0300, Russel Winder > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:20 -0700, Bill Baxter wrote: > >> I'm not a huge fan of Bazaar :-p , > > > > Hummm... May I ask why? > > Could someone please explain to me w

Re: [OTx2] Windows

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS is so horrible. For what it's worth, I never had any problems with my Windows install - the only time I reinstalled was when I upgraded to newer versions

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:26:32 +0300, Gour wrote: What about 'choice' or maybe we should move to the OS used by majority of people where re-installation is very common troubleshooting procedure? That's a bad analogy. A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS is s