Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:20:19 -0500 Matthew Caron matt.ca...@redlion.net wrote: On 01/02/2013 04:18 PM, Walter Bright wrote: Why would you need to? If your mail store is IMAP, just let it rebuild. I don't store email on the server, I store it locally. I gave that up years ago when I

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread David Nadlinger
On Saturday, 5 January 2013 at 09:30:41 UTC, Pierre Rouleau wrote: I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none? D 2.062 does not even exist yet, the current development version of changelog.dd

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Pierre Rouleau
On 13-01-04 3:55 PM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/4/2013 12:23 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: On 13-01-04 2:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/4/2013 8:59 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: Don't you think a process that requires reviewing these titles *before* the actual software release announcement posting

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Walter Bright
On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none? There will be.

Re: Runtime code reloading in D, part 1

2013-01-05 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-12-30 13:32, Benjamin Thaut wrote: An article about runtime code reloading in the context of game developement. A topic I'm currently working on in my spare time. I hope it holds some valuable information for everyone working with D. http://3d.benjamin-thaut.de/?p=25 This looks very

Re: Amber

2013-01-05 Thread nazriel
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 18:02:30 UTC, Lars Ivar Igesund wrote: Dear D community, I've been urged by many others to post about Amber here. It is a programming language being derived from D1, with a compiler written using D1 and Tango, with LLVM and C backends. The quality of code and

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Jonathan M Davis, el 4 de January a las 08:12 me escribiste: On Friday, January 04, 2013 14:30:01 Leandro Lucarella wrote: I think the best way to do it is to put it in the repository where the changes were made (this implies having separate release notes for dmd, phobos and druntime, I

Re: Managing email [ was Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release ]

2013-01-05 Thread Russel Winder
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 02:20 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: […] Sounds like you must be very good at Linux. I would never have been able to do it without this guide: http://library.linode.com/email/postfix/dovecot-mysql-debian-6-squeeze I found that to be more contrived, obscure, and

Re: C++11 - using const and mutable for thread safety [Video]

2013-01-05 Thread Paulo Pinto
On Friday, 4 January 2013 at 19:03:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/4/2013 6:00 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: 03-Jan-2013 12:39, Michal Minich пишет: Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread safety

Re: Managing email [ was Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release ]

2013-01-05 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:18:07 + Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 02:20 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Yea. Google's Don't be evil is a complete load of self-rationalizing bullshit. I mean, christ, their whole business is based on mining/selling personal

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Pierre Rouleau
D 2.062 does not even exist yet, the current development version of changelog.dd just made it to http://dlang.org/changelog.html by accident. Davi OK. Was not obvious for me when I looked at the change log. And BTW, the change log page still shows it. Is this intentional? If it is,

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Pierre Rouleau
On 13-01-05 5:39 AM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none? There will be. Do you have a plan of what they will be and a

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Walter Bright
On 1/5/2013 10:06 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: On 13-01-05 5:39 AM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none? There will be.

Re: D 1.076 and 2.061 release

2013-01-05 Thread Pierre Rouleau
On 13-01-05 4:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/5/2013 10:06 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: On 13-01-05 5:39 AM, Walter Bright wrote: On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote: I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version