On 10.10.2014 02:30, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/9/2014 11:25 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Martin is very much against this, one reason is that it does not work
with
druntime in a shared library.
I can understand that, but I also don't know what a reasonable use case
would be for sharing a libr
On 09.10.2014 21:38, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Thursday, 9 October 2014 at 18:33:25 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
This is a gcc extension, which isn't supported under Windows by dmd.
Can you add this attribute in GDC/LDC as part of a D file aswell?
http://wiki.dlang.org/LDC-specific_language_c
On 09.10.2014 21:46, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-10-09 20:33, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
This is a gcc extension, which isn't supported under Windows by dmd.
It seems to be possible in Visual Studio [1], but that still leaves OMF.
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1113409/attribute-cons
On 10/10/2014 12:37 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
It was my impression that phobos in a shared library would soon become the
default on linux, i.e. any application would use it by default. In that case,
all supported GCs might actually have to be included in the shared library.
The options to embed
Hi,
there is a new version of Visual D available for download at
http://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
It is telling that after such a long time since the last release the
major feature is the update of another project that is just installed
with Visual D, but I think it is
On Friday, 10 October 2014 at 07:37:49 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
It was my impression that phobos in a shared library would soon
become the default on linux, i.e. any application would use it
by default. In that case, all supported GCs might actually have
to be included in the shared library.
--
Announcing Despiker, a GUI real time profiler for game development
--
This is is a visualizer for the Tharsis.prof frame-based profiler
library.
Profiling with write
Walter Bright, el 9 de October a las 17:28 me escribiste:
> On 10/9/2014 7:25 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> >At the same time I don't see what real benefit such runtime options brings to
> >the table. This is why in my PR garbage collector is currently chosen during
> >compilation time.
>
> Choosing at co
On 10/10/14, 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish:-)
I, too, think envvars are quite appropriate here. -- Andrei
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment variables to tune program X will also affect programs
A-Z.
On 10/10/14, 7:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment variables to tune program X will also affect
programs A-Z.
On 10/10/2014 9:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/10/14, 7:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment variabl
Am 11.10.2014 06:25, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/10/14, 7:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment variabl
13 matches
Mail list logo
