Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread extrawurst via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 09:04:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 07/26/2015 11:13 PM, anonymous wrote: Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ? I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August. We're trying hard here to meet some deadlines, so things are really simple.

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread Joseph Cassman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 09:04:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 07/26/2015 11:13 PM, anonymous wrote: Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ? I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August. We're trying hard here to meet some deadlines, so things are really simple.

This Week in D 28: two new books, long argument, beta

2015-07-27 Thread Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
This Week in #Dlang - new beta, two new books announced, long argument on template duck types vs Rust traits: http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jul-26.html BTW I don't always post these to the announce forum or reddit each week, but I do tend to tweet them: https://twitter.com/adamdruppe

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread Joseph Cassman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Second beta for the 2.068.0 release. http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/ http://ftp.digitalmars.com/ Also available on Travis-CI as dmd-2.068.0-b2. The changelog (http://dlang.org/changelog.html#2.068.0)

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 18:58:33 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote: Sorry for the following rant but I am frustrated by the poor quality of support for Windows 64 development. rant I understand that frustration. I had some modest problems getting it to work with -m64 on my home computer.

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread Joseph Cassman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 20:43:38 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 18:58:33 UTC, Joseph Cassman wrote: Sorry for the following rant but I am frustrated by the poor quality of support for Windows 64 development. rant I understand that frustration. I had some modest problems

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 23:40:28 UTC, anonymous wrote: On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 09:04:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 07/26/2015 11:13 PM, anonymous wrote: Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ? I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August. We're trying hard

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 23:49:34 UTC, anonymous wrote: On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 23:40:28 UTC, anonymous wrote: On Monday, 27 July 2015 at 09:04:08 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 07/26/2015 11:13 PM, anonymous wrote: [...] We're trying hard here to meet some deadlines, so things are

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 07/26/2015 08:13 PM, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Is it not better to use 7z format? It has more compression ratios than gz/bz2, and they can be easily handled on Windows. xz is 7-zip same entropy encoding.

Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 07/26/2015 11:13 PM, anonymous wrote: Is std.expermimental.allocator planned for 2.068 ? I see it's still not merged and we already almost in August. We're trying hard here to meet some deadlines, so things are really simple. If something is ready (reviewed, tested, documented, and merged