On 06/28/2016 10:47 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 23:26:25 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
[...]
I wouldn't call 1.0 * -1.0 == 1.0 boring!
What is this about ?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16027
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 23:26:25 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 23:15:06 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
Awesome, releases are becoming more and more boring. I like it!
I wouldn't call 1.0 * -1.0 == 1.0 boring!
What is this about ?
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 09:18:34 UTC, qznc wrote:
Did you also compare to strlen from libc? I'd guess GNU libc
uses a lot more tricks like vector instructions.
I did test with the libc strlen, although the D libraries did not
have a strlen for dchar or wchar. I'm currently using this for
On 6/26/16 8:01 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Several people during DConf asked abut tips and tricks on code review.
So I wrote an article about it:
http://www.deadalnix.me/2016/06/27/on-code-review/
Nice work. Let's see:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4q9fl5/on_code_review/ --
Andrei
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 09:31:46 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
If we were in interview, I'd ask you "what does this returns
if you pass it an empty string ?"
Since no one is answering:
It depends on the memory right before c. But if there is at
least one 0 right before it - which is quite
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 23:26:25 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 23:15:06 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
Awesome, releases are becoming more and more boring. I like it!
I wouldn't call 1.0 * -1.0 == 1.0 boring!
Yeah I was thinking this haha.
Now IUP library collections' interfaces accomplished.
IUP(3.18): http://code.dlang.org/packages/iupd
IM(3.10): http://code.dlang.org/packages/imd
CD(5.9):http://code.dlang.org/packages/cdd
lua(5.3.3): http://code.dlang.org/packages/nluad
As I'm not good enough, all bindings may have many
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 01:53:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 16:40:08 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
After watching Andre's sentinel thing, I'm playing with strlen
on char strings with 4 terminating 0s instead of a single one.
Seems to work and is 4x faster compared to the run
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 16:40:08 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
After watching Andre's sentinel thing, I'm playing with strlen
on char strings with 4 terminating 0s instead of a single one.
Seems to work and is 4x faster compared to the runtime version.
nothrow pure size_t strlen2(const(char)* c)
On 6/27/2016 3:11 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.071.1.
http://dlang.org/download.html
This point release fixes a few issues over 2.071.0, see the changelog
for more details.
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.1.html
-Martin
Thank you, Martin!
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 03:11:26 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 01:53:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
If we were in interview, I'd ask you "what does this returns
if you pass it an empty string ?"
I'd say use this one instead, to avoid negative size_t. It is
also a little fa
11 matches
Mail list logo
