On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 18:09:28 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two
extensive blog posts, which explain non-uniform random
sampling and the mir.random.flex package (part of Mir >
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two extensive
blog posts, which explain non-uniform random sampling and the
mir.random.flex package (part of Mir > 0.16-beta2):
On Wednesday, 10 August 2016 at 18:35:03 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
So true. Then I will do PR's first.
I finally got around implementing running dmd/druntime/phobos
pull requests against all dub packages. Thank you digger, for
making it so easy.
I did a run of master + druntime#1602.
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two extensive
blog posts, which explain non-uniform random sampling and the
mir.random.flex package (part of Mir > 0.16-beta2):
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two extensive
blog posts, which explain non-uniform random sampling and the
mir.random.flex package (part of Mir > 0.16-beta2):
Hey all,
I am proud to publish a report of my GSoC work as two extensive
blog posts, which explain non-uniform random sampling and the
mir.random.flex package (part of Mir > 0.16-beta2):
http://blog.mir.dlang.io/random/2016/08/19/intro-to-random-sampling.html
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 11:45:37 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 01:34:36 UTC, jkpl wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
for a project like Terminix, dub with LDC builds in 8.6s,
while Meson and ninja take only 6s here.
Did
On Thursday, 18 August 2016 at 17:05:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On 08/11/2016 04:38 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
That will just leave one hole in conjunction with the @trusted
destructor, which is (presumably) not easy to fix without much
larger changes to the type system, as well as to how container
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 01:34:36 UTC, jkpl wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
for a project like Terminix, dub with LDC builds in 8.6s,
while Meson and ninja take only 6s here.
Did you try to build with DUB but with WIFI or ethernet
interface
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 06:44:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be nice to have the whole picture now, before
implementing DIP1000.
It can be reviewed after the spec is inferred from
implementation. But yes, it can be unclear how the implementation
can affect the review process.
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 08:38:12 UTC, MGW wrote:
The excellent programming language is D. I all the projects
make, nearly two years, only on D (dmd) + Qt (QtE4 and QtE5).
What are the advantages and drawbacks you faced and face while
working with D?
How are old D programs compiled with
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 17:21:14 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 13:18:04 UTC, MGW wrote:
Hello, could you share your experience with D language? How it
feels to work with it?
The excellent programming language is D. I all the projects make,
nearly two years, only on D
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 06:44:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be nice to have the whole picture now, before
implementing DIP1000. Then it's possible to review them
together, making sure the end goal is actual possible to
achieve. Now we just have to trust Andrei and Walter that all
On 2016-08-21 22:01, Dicebot wrote:
This week I had a tele-meeting with Andrei and Walter regarding the fate
of DIP1000 (https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1000.md)
and intented way to move forward with it. This is a short summary of the
meeting.
Approval of DIP1000
14 matches
Mail list logo
