Walter Bright Wrote in message:
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
>
> Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense it.
> Thank you, Symantec!
>
Another long term goal met. Congratulations!
Will this change in licensing pave the
On 4/8/2017 4:24 PM, Jethro wrote:
Does this mean that we can now embed the D compiler in to a commercial D app to
be used as a scripting like engine(D app compiles D code then dynamically links
in code while running)?
Yes.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Does this mean that we can now embed the D compiler in to a
commercial D app to be used as a
On 4/8/2017 12:07 PM, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
May be we can talk about pr strategy for D in general at Dconf.
I expect that how to best take advantage of this development will be a hot topic
at DConf.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 07:57:02 UTC, kinke wrote:
So while compiling each file separately in parallel is
potentially much much faster, the produced release binary may
be slower due to less/no cross-module inlining (e.g., LDC's
option is still experimental and known to have issues).
In
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Good news! Thank you!
I gave a hint of this - additionally mentioning Dconf - to
heise.de,
On 4/8/2017 10:16 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
To make sure you have your history correct. GDC wrote the work-alike
x86 assembler, and later dual-licensed it to share with LDC. A little
while later I dropped it from GDC as it was not really fit for
purpose, and rather
On 8 April 2017 at 18:48, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On 4/8/2017 1:36 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>>
>> On 7 April 2017 at 23:49, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
>>
On 4/8/2017 1:33 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
AFAIK, Symantec were under no particular obligation here, but none-the-less
chose the consumer/developer-friendly route, and I for one couldn't be more
appreciative. I'm one who can be very critical of, well, everything, but the
fine folks
On 4/8/2017 1:36 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 7 April 2017 at 23:49, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Note that this also resolves the long-standing legal issue with D's inline
assembler being backend licensed, and so
On 4/8/2017 1:19 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Anyone "in the know" have a any "inside scoop" regarding the such organization's
perspective on the "zlib/libpng" license? I tend to favor it for my own OSS
projects, since it's (in my perspective) at least as liberal as Boost, but very,
On 2017-04-07 17:14, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
it. Thank you, Symantec!
This is some amazing news!! :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
First release candidate for 2.074.0.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.074.0.html
Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
-Martin
On 7 April 2017 at 23:49, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Note that this also resolves the long-standing legal issue with D's inline
> assembler being backend licensed, and so not portable to gdc/ldc.
>
That makes the assumption that
On 04/07/2017 11:14 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
it. Thank you, Symantec!
Wow! This is HUGE news for D, and may I say, I think some *major*
respect (and "props, j00!") are
On 04/07/2017 05:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
2. It's on all of the "Accepted OSS Licenses" lists that major corps have
because of Boost itself being used in those companies. If your license
isn't on
the list, your project isn't being used.
Yup. We figured every corporation that uses C++ has
16 matches
Mail list logo