On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 03:11:34 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
You don't need to have subsystem for Linux to use bash. Just
the standard git client for Windows is enough.
Happy to find out about this. It's not like using git bash
everyday on Windows to know this by default.
sh setup.sh
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 03:37:11 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
cd test
make all -j8
Command error: undefined switch '-j8'
Why are you adding -j8 ? Does it say to do so in the
instructions ? Try without it. (I can't test here as typing
from my phone).
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 04:54:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, March 12, 2018 03:37:11 Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 19:58:51 UTC, rumbu wrote:
> [...]
Why are you adding -j8 ? Does it say to do so in the
instructions ? Try without
On Monday, March 12, 2018 03:31:36 Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> If Phobos looks like a mess to C# programmers, so much the worse
> for C# programmers. However I doubt they this is true in the
> general case. It's better in many ways, but different and
> unfamiliar and
On Monday, March 12, 2018 03:37:11 Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 19:58:51 UTC, rumbu wrote:
> > On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 17:15:28 UTC, Seb wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Yes, I'm the typical lazy convenient Windows user scared of the
> > terminal
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 16:15:22 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 14:37:28 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
And this clarifies the source of your confusion. The D
programming language is an open source project, not a
for-profit company. D is not the language you're looking for.
There
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 19:58:51 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 17:15:28 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
Yes, I'm the typical lazy convenient Windows user scared of the
terminal window.
[...]
I am happy for Posix users. Theoretically the process is the
same on Windows.
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 07:59:53 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:10:28 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 00:36:19 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
And personally, depending on the problem, C# is better to
program in than D. I still don't know why C#
I probably released this a bit too soon... it seems to have a
memory leak and eventually pushes all other server functions out
if I leave it running.
So I took the search back down for now until I can debug that, or
maybe just rewrite the program to something fundamentally more
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 16:15:22 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 14:37:28 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
And this clarifies the source of your confusion. The D
programming language is an open source project, not a
for-profit company. D is not the language you're looking for.
There
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 07:59:53 UTC, rumbu wrote:
Because, even the language creators seem to not recognize this,
D looks like C# with *native compilation*, the syntax is 95%
identical. Basically, if my source code doesn't use any .NET
framework function, it will compile successfully with
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 17:15:28 UTC, Seb wrote:
I assume you are using Windows?
Yes, I'm the typical lazy convenient Windows user scared of the
terminal window.
Setup on Posix is really simple.
git clone all three repos + run make.
I am happy for Posix users. Theoretically the
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 13:41:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
About a month ago, Sebastian Wilzbach sent an email out to a
few of the core D folks asking for feedback on a survey he had
put together. He thought it would be useful for the Foundation
to use in order to make decisions about
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 16:15:22 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 14:37:28 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
And this clarifies the source of your confusion. The D
programming language is an open source project, not a
for-profit company. D is not the language you're looking for.
There
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 16:15:22 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 14:37:28 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
And this clarifies the source of your confusion. The D
programming language is an open source project, not a
for-profit company. D is not the language you're looking for.
There
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 14:37:28 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
And this clarifies the source of your confusion. The D
programming language is an open source project, not a
for-profit company. D is not the language you're looking for.
There are 3 years since C# is also open source project. Last
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:13:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/8/18 9:58 AM, joe wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 10:57:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Here's something I wrote up on const:
/snip
May be not entirely related, but a little gotcha.
given:
interface XY {}
class
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 13:36:27 UTC, R wrote:
I am sure that lots of D members will be quick to point out,
that C# is run by a commercial company and D has only open
source contributors. Now why did you not contribute! /sarcasm
I'd like to point out, that C# is run by a commercial
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 13:36:27 UTC, R wrote:
With the usual response here: "Why do you not fix it yourself
or pay for it". Maybe because most people who come want to use
the tools and be productive and not spend their time fixing up
those tools.
I've never seen anyone write that. Most
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 12:41:28 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
Kai has been working recently [1] on updating LDC 0.17.x
(ltsmaster) to work with LLVM 6, PowerPC, AArch64, ... You may
want to take advantage of that activity to get better bootstrap
compiler support for your platforms. For
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 07:59:53 UTC, rumbu wrote:
Because, even the language creators seem to not recognize this,
D looks like C# with *native compilation*, the syntax is 95%
identical. Basically, if my source code doesn't use any .NET
framework function, it will compile successfully with
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 08:43:25 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
The GNU package manager updated LDC to 1.7.0 which now provides
x86_64-linux, see
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/L/. Runtime
dependencies and build are listed at
https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2525193#tabs-runtime-deps,
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 10:05:49 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 21:43:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello, the vision document of the Founation for the first six
months of 2018 is here:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2018H1
According to the State of D Survey, 71% of
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:25:07 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
betterc is just another way of supporting that crowd..and it's
a very big crowd.
Yeah, 29% of the crowd.
29% of the existing D crowd who answered the survey, which means
around 150 people, or about how many download one compiler,
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 07:59:53 UTC, rumbu wrote:
My opinion is that the day when C# will compile to native (on
any platform), the C# developer interest in D will drop
instantly.
OT:
Interestingly, my uni is still stuck in the OOP paradigm, and is
now teaching intro to OOP using .NET
The GNU package manager updated LDC to 1.7.0 which now provides
x86_64-linux, see https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/L/.
Runtime dependencies and build are listed at
https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2525193#tabs-runtime-deps, including
0.17.4 (bootstrap) and LLVM 3.8.1.
LDC 0.17.4
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:10:28 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 00:36:19 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
And personally, depending on the problem, C# is better to
program in than D. I still don't know why C# programmers are
willing to give up C# and prefer to use D.
C#
27 matches
Mail list logo
