On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 19:45:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:54:56 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:32:20 UTC, 9il wrote:
"Struct non-static methods marked with the return
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 21:53:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If you don't want the formatting code to be part of Phobos, I
respect your choice.
Why did you think I may want it?
Phobos is almost not used in my work.
You, Andrey, and Atila don't care about language features that
have
If you don't want the formatting code to be part of Phobos, I respect your
choice.
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 17:20:03 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:53:11 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
For
v = cast(size_t) x;
I thought @safe prevented explicitly casting an immutable to a
mutable, but the code below seems to suggest it is ok in this
case...
void main()
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:54:56 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:32:20 UTC, 9il wrote:
"Struct non-static methods marked with the return attribute
ensure the returned reference will not outlive the struct
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 04:09:59 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 12:32:35 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
How does your work compare to sumtype? Would mir.algebraic
offer any benefits, which would make it worth switching over?
replied at
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:53:11 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
For
v = cast(size_t) x;
I thought @safe prevented explicitly casting an immutable to a
mutable, but the code below seems to suggest it is ok in this
case...
void main() @safe
{
immutable x = 32;
auto v = cast(size_t) x;
}
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 17:07:16 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:54:56 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
[...]
If I am correct Dlang doesn't provide an instrument to
validate it, isn't it?
What alternative
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:54:56 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
The issue isn't that the reference outlives the struct. It's
that the reference outlives a tag change of the tagged union.
If I am correct Dlang doesn't provide an
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:32:20 UTC, 9il wrote:
"Struct non-static methods marked with the return attribute
ensure the returned reference will not outlive the struct
instance."
The issue isn't that the reference outlives
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 14:27:02 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 22.12.20 04:56, 9il wrote:
6. Algebraic type subsets are supported by `get`,
`trustedGet`, `_is`, and `this` primitives. You can operate
with algebraic subset as with the type of the original
typeset. [1]
"trustedGet" - That
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:32:20 UTC, 9il wrote:
"Struct non-static methods marked with the return attribute
ensure the returned reference will not outlive the struct
instance."
The issue isn't that the reference outlives the struct. It's that
the reference outlives a tag change of
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 14:27:02 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 22.12.20 04:56, 9il wrote:
6. Algebraic type subsets are supported by `get`,
`trustedGet`, `_is`, and `this` primitives. You can operate
with algebraic subset as with the type of the original
typeset. [1]
"trustedGet" - That
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 03:56:13 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 11:00:05 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 04:54:19 UTC, 9il wrote:
Truly algebraic Variant and Nullable with an
order-independent list of types.
Thanks for sharing it!
Could you
On 22.12.20 04:56, 9il wrote:
6. Algebraic type subsets are supported by `get`, `trustedGet`, `_is`,
and `this` primitives. You can operate with algebraic subset as with the
type of the original typeset. [1]
"trustedGet" - That name smells of a safety violation. And indeed
(compile with
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 09:18:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/21/2020 8:33 PM, 9il wrote:
These functions in Phobos would make a great advertisement
for Mir.
How this possible?
A lot more people will have Phobos than Phobos+Mir. If they are
perusing the source code and see Mir
On 12/21/2020 8:51 PM, 9il wrote:
... I just have thought maybe I have missed something and DLF helps Mir with
advertising at least a bit, maybe at least with two-three tweets per year? The
last time @D_Programming tweeted something about Mir was in 2016.
I thought anything in D.announce got
On 12/21/2020 8:33 PM, 9il wrote:
These functions in Phobos would make a great advertisement for Mir.
How this possible?
A lot more people will have Phobos than Phobos+Mir. If they are perusing the
source code and see Mir contributed excellent floating point formatting code,
they may have
18 matches
Mail list logo
