On Saturday, 17 July 2021 at 00:56:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
I have translate this article into `chinese`:
[用d开车](https://fqbqrr.blog.csdn.net/article/details/118571177)
Thank you so
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 19:37:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/16/21 10:52 AM, Dylan Graham wrote:
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 13:54:36 UTC, vit wrote:
What adventage has record over normal immutable/const class?
In terms of mutability, none.
The duplicate method, however, lets
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know
of any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be the
first time it's been employed in this specific manner.
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 13:54:36 UTC, vit wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 23:16:05 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/record)
[Github](https://github.com/hmmdyl/record)
This is record. It aims to implement records similar to what
C# has by leveraging D's
On Friday, 16 July 2021 at 13:14:22 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 23:16:05 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/record)
[Github](https://github.com/hmmdyl/record)
```D
module myapp;
class A{}
auto MyRecord = record!(get!(A, "a")); // would
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 23:16:05 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/record)
[Github](https://github.com/hmmdyl/record)
Found and squashed some critical bugs. Thanks to Adam and Rikki
for the help.
Before, record would throw a compilation error due when
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 23:16:05 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
... init-only-setters like in C#, wherein at the end of
construction or duplication, the init lambda for the field is
called, and the field can be set that once.
This has been implemented with `get_compute`. Example:
```D
alias
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 23:16:05 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/record)
[Github](https://github.com/hmmdyl/record)
record now has support for custom default initialisers. Example:
```D
import drecord;
alias DefaultRecord = record!(
// The third
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/record)
[Github](https://github.com/hmmdyl/record)
This is record. It aims to implement records similar to what C#
has by leveraging D's metaprogramming. [C# Example
1](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/fundamentals/types/records) [C# Example
On Friday, 9 July 2021 at 14:30:07 UTC, lili wrote:
Great Work!
Thanks!
Why standard D Runtime can not run on MCU?
The standard D Runtime is reliant on a fully-fledged OS, which
don't fit onto small embedded devices and [they're incompatible
with
On Saturday, 19 June 2021 at 13:31:11 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[Github](https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR)
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr)
[Previous
announcement](https://forum.dlang.org/post/giigcnoyxfoxxaevj...@forum.dlang.org)
Once LWDR is stable enough, I want the next version to
[Github](https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR)
[DUB](https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr)
[Previous
announcement](https://forum.dlang.org/post/giigcnoyxfoxxaevj...@forum.dlang.org)
LWDR (Light Weight D Runtime) is a ground-up implementation of a
D runtime targeting the ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers
On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 09:14:52 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:57:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know
of any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be
On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 14:46:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/1/21 7:57 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know
of any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be the
first
On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 15:41:12 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Github: https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR
DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr
[...]
Well done sir!
Keep it up ☀️
Thank you :)
On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 11:16:01 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Good to see this work come to fruition. First thing I stumbled
across was a
[mispelling](https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR/blob/eb5de110ba2cff4bd0e654e8a68b59fc5eb76157/source/rtoslink.d#L14) of one of the RTOS hooks.
I'll get on it!
On Thursday, 27 May 2021 at 01:04:37 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
Sponsored :)
Very excited for GDC 12!
On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 01:16:46 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 31/05/2021 1:05 PM, Dylan Graham wrote:
I haven't put any thought into the license. Since LWDR is
derived from DRuntime, I assume I'll have to use its license.
If not, I'd like to go with something permissive like MIT.
Boost
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Github: https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR
DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr
As for my next steps, I'm going to look at implementing TLS
variables. It doesn't look too difficult.
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 17:31:37 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Hi, all!
This is LWDR (Light Weight D Runtime) It is a ground-up
implementation of a D runtime targeting the ARM Cortex-M
microcontrollers and other microcontroller platforms with
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 15:35:34 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
LWDR currently supports the following language features:
- Class allocations and deallocations (via new and delete)
- Struct heap allocations and deallocations (via new
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 15:07:54 UTC, Denis Feklushkin wrote:
Nice job!
Are you tried compile apps with Phobos?
Thank you!
No, I haven't tried any of Phobos yet. It should work, but will
leak like a sieve.
I need to develop a solution that tracks memory allocations and
exposes a
On Sunday, 30 May 2021 at 14:28:25 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Github: https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR
DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr
I added a Wiki tutorial on compiling with LDC and DUB (which is
how I currently test LWDR). It's about 12:53 AM AEST, so I'm
heading to bed. I plan on
Github: https://github.com/0dyl/LWDR
DUB: https://code.dlang.org/packages/lwdr
Hi, all!
This is LWDR (Light Weight D Runtime) It is a ground-up
implementation of a D runtime targeting the ARM Cortex-M
microcontrollers and other microcontroller platforms with RTOSes
(Real Time Operating
On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 20:27:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Hi all!
It's that wonderful time of month again. Beerconf is happening
on the 27th and 28th. I'll be participating probably only on
the 27th.
Bring your brews/other and D topics/other and we'll discuss
things.
A
On Tuesday, 2 March 2021 at 08:58:15 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
development on Visual D, the Visual Studio extension that adds
D language support to VS 2008-2019, has been rather slow
recently, but finally the results of recent months have been
released.
[...]
Thanks for update. I
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 00:48:34 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/12/20 4:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This time, we will try to keep a running tally of things
discussed, and post back here (this was something asked about
on slack, and I think it's a good idea).
Here is
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 09:54:46 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
a new version of Visual D, the Visual Studio extension that
adds D language support to VS2008-2019, is available at
[...]
Nvm it didn't hang. Just took a very long time to complete
semantic highlighting.
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 09:54:46 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
a new version of Visual D, the Visual Studio extension that
adds D language support to VS2008-2019, is available at
https://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
Major highlights of this release are
-
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 09:54:46 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
a new version of Visual D, the Visual Studio extension that
adds D language support to VS2008-2019, is available at
[...]
This is awesome! Thank you so much for this. I use Visual D all
the time. Keep up the great work
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 04:06:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/10/2018 05:47 AM, Dylan Graham wrote:
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 10:05:49 UTC, rumbu wrote:
According to the State of D Survey, 71% of the respondents
don't care about betterC. Why is betterC on the priority
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 02:02:15 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:58:50 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
i.e. How can the D Foundation encourage new additional
resoures to focus on things that also matter to the community.
and btw. the mention about strengthing
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:50:22 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:36:51 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
The D Language Foundation, being the leading body of D, should
hold some responsibility to the interests of the majority.
Please read my post from earlier:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:41:33 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:25:07 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean at that last sentence.
I mean, cause D is so compatible with C/C++/Java/C# - that you
can easily switch between them.
Whereas as Go and
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:45:01 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:36:51 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
The D Language Foundation, being the leading body of D, should
hold some responsibility to the interests of the majority.
And also the minority. A lesson that
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:21:27 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:06:08 UTC, R wrote:
Point to the wall on the left side. That is what your talking
to. D its focus on C++ as a bad plan has been made pushed by
many people ( lots who left ). Its like asking Go for
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:10:28 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 00:36:19 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Every day D becomes more like C++ 2.0, why can't it just be D?
Oddly enough, I think this is D's strength.
I really don't.
Golang tried to draw the line, and look
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 01:06:08 UTC, R wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 00:36:19 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Well, no. I'm more concerned with the fact that the D Language
Foundation is focused on BetterC, yet does not mention DLLs at
all.
For God's sake, if D is the future, why does it
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 00:36:19 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 11:07:56 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 10:47:09 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
[Omitted]
I also would like to point out that I don't care if some
open-source developers decide
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 11:07:56 UTC, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 10:47:09 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
Yeah. Why should D worry about tying itself into C when it
can't even interface with itself through DLLs?
A reasonable point.
But.. in any case.. people work
On Saturday, 10 March 2018 at 10:05:49 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 21:43:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello, the vision document of the Founation for the first six
months of 2018 is here:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2018H1
According to the State of D Survey, 71% of
41 matches
Mail list logo
