Re: dfmt 0.1.0

2015-03-07 Thread FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-03-07 at 07:51, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Many C++ projects are returning to it, Go enforces it if you let it, many Python projects are starting to use it in spite of PEP-8. Now, that you mentioned Python, it was one of the main reasons why I moved away from

Re: Reloaded for dub

2015-02-20 Thread FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-02-20 at 15:00, Kingsley wrote: Just thought I would share this in case anyone else finds it useful. I wrote a tiny utility that detects changes to D files and then rebuilds and re-executes the main binary using dub. I see two problems: 1. It doesn't sleep for a few seconds after

Re: DStep - Bindings Generator 0.0.1

2015-02-03 Thread FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-02-03 at 14:05, Mike Parker wrote: On 2/3/2015 7:01 PM, Chris wrote: And still nobody knows what DStep is all about? Define nobody. I've known about it for quite a while now. Well, there is someone called nobody on the D forums... :) He might know about DStep, and that would make

Re: This Week in D: Issue #4

2015-02-02 Thread FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-02-02 at 05:57, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: I can't believe it, but yet another week has already passed, so up late to release this again! http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/feb-01.html It's great! I have to wonder though, why have you chosen this naming convention: jan-12, jan-18, jan-25,

Re: Sociomantic: We're looking for a Software Developer! (D language)

2015-01-08 Thread FG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-01-08 14:01 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Just to mention that this call is particularly focused on getting new people for my team at Sociomantic. There is one important piece of information missing: Are you still using only D1? If not, how is your code base currently split into D1

Re: A Mathematician looks at D

2013-02-19 Thread FG
On 2013-02-19 01:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote: I can do that just as easily without a REPL. With a much reduced interactivity and more slowly. Slightly so. I wouldn't say much. But of course, I'm not saying that a REPL wouldn't be nice to have. Just saying that edit, re-compile/run really

Re: vibe.d 0.7.12 released

2013-02-11 Thread FG
On 2013-02-11 21:11, Russel Winder wrote: Python is not being compared to D here, vibe.d is being compared to what? Flask, Bottle,… Who knows, maybe Python was being compared. You can have a nice HTTP server in Python in 0 lines of code, by running: python -m SimpleHTTPServer :) Issues

Re: vibe.d 0.7.12 released

2013-02-11 Thread FG
On 2013-02-11 21:37, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2013-02-11 20:08, FG wrote: I'm struggling with the temptation to move a Python website to vibe.d. What keeps me from doing that are Django templates. Not even because vibe's templates have to be recompiled each time some small markup change

Re: An article about contract programming

2013-02-05 Thread FG
On 2013-02-05 17:57, bearophile wrote: In D this code doesn't asserts: struct Foo { int x = 200; invariant() { assert(x 100); } } void main() { auto f = Foo(10); } Maybe it's good to introduce in D as in Ada a call to the invariant when the whole struct is assigned.

Re: Higgs, a JavaScript JIT done in D

2013-02-05 Thread FG
On 2013-02-05 18:24, Matthew Caron wrote: On 02/05/2013 05:17 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote: On Monday, 4 February 2013 at 23:02:04 UTC, MattCoder wrote: And by the way, the project looks awesome! I absolutely agree. I don't, but that's because I hate JavaScript only slightly less than PHP or

Re: Higgs, a JavaScript JIT done in D

2013-02-05 Thread FG
On 2013-02-05 18:21, Matthew Caron wrote: In all fairness, I wasn't aware of text until this comment, so perhaps the author was not either? There are still many examples around with to!string, so it's easy not to notice text() if you are like me and stop looking after you found something that

Re: Dgame

2013-02-04 Thread FG
On 2013-02-04 19:12, Namespace wrote: I had no plans to explain myself (also see no reason why I should do this). I only wanted to write my decision in my thread. Hope you will pick Dgame up again. And until then enjoy C++, which since C++11 it isn't so much different than using D. (You were

Re: A look at the D programming language by Ferdynand Górski

2013-01-07 Thread FG
On 2013-01-07 12:55, nazriel wrote: Anyways, great read. Also nice to see that more and more Polish people are getting interested in D Programming Language. Maybe in near future I will be able to meet someone in real world living close to me and drink some beer and talk about D. Who knows.

Re: A look at the D programming language by Ferdynand Górski

2013-01-07 Thread FG
On 2013-01-07 14:31, Chris wrote: (one more Fibbonacci example and I'll go maD!) Sorry for using the most overused one. :) However, in order to convince people to use D for new projects, it would be nice to have some practical real-world examples and possibly a list of Made with D-software.

Re: A look at the D programming language by Ferdynand Górski

2013-01-07 Thread FG
On 2013-01-07 18:20, David Nadlinger wrote: Not sure if you were implying this, but actually there was a D conference in Poland already, the Tango Conference in 2008. ;) Oh. I didn't know much about D back then and haven't tried Tango. IIRC I only started following D after regular expressions