On Monday, 16 October 2023 at 16:55:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've just pushed out Vijay's talk, the last from Day 1, to the
DConf '23 playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIldXzSkPUXWH97DYBENhAqLk4DUqKUmf=any30KpW1hAki1IF
Walter's talk will be up in a few days. I'll announce here
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 19:06:26 UTC, Dmytro Katyukha wrote:
[...]
Nice, I like it. Reminds me what we're using in Python.
On Sunday, 8 October 2023 at 13:21:12 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I have another thing to add. You argued about reasons not to
use macros but these reasons don't apply to AST Macros, they
won't allow constructing new languages like
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I have another thing to add. You argued about reasons not to use
macros but these reasons don't apply to AST Macros, they won't
allow constructing new languages like in Lisp or in Neat.
Typed AST Macros would only accept
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:28:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been a long, long while since I published anything on the
blog. I do intend to get pick it up again down the road, but
Walter recently surprised me with plans of his own. He's taken
the topic of his DConf '23 talk and derived a
On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 10:22:31 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole
wrote:
The approach that I think will work well for us is to support
reference counting on structs & classes, and make them not
adhere to DIP1000.
Does that mean you are against dip1000 or do you want both?
On Saturday, 5 June 2021 at 09:14:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The current GC strategy is a dead end. No GC makes the language
too much of a C++ with no real edge. D needs to offer something
other languages do not, to offset the cost of learning the
language complexities.
I think the
On Sunday, 6 June 2021 at 10:03:11 UTC, evilrat wrote:
## (oh my) gentool v0.4 is now out.
It is my fancy tool to generate extern(C++) stuff quicker, it
takes regular compiler flags that you usually pass to clang and
translates C/C++ code to D.
This release has one new feature: support
On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 19:31:57 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
Because of this Phobos must take the lowest common denominator
approach (malloc/free) in order to be able to accommodate all
the different needs.
This uniformization sounds too good to be true. I think most
people think that, but it's
Yet another GC vs NoGC thread :sigh:
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 14:02:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The latest post in the D and C series dives into the weeds of D
and C strings:
Thanks, I wasn't even aware of this.
However, I wish the behavior would be the same between string
bounded storage variables and string literals.
I think
On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 08:12:57 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
[...]
Nice, thanks.
Generally, I think providing a meta programming framework by the
language/compiler is like any decision equipped with tradeoffs.
Technically, more power is better than providing a simple
language with
On Thursday, 15 April 2021 at 04:01:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
We will talk about compile time function execution (CTFE).
Although this is announced on Meetup[1] as well, you can
connect directly at
https://us04web.zoom.us/j/2248614462?pwd=VTl4OXNjVHNhUTJibms2NlVFS3lWZz09
April 15, 2021
On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 13:17:49 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 21:27:55 UTC, sighoya wrote:
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 06:37:03 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Native CTFE and macros are a beautiful thing though.
What did you mean with native?
When cx needs to
On Monday, 19 April 2021 at 06:37:03 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
Native CTFE and macros are a beautiful thing though.
What did you mean with native?
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 at 07:28:36 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 18:11:43 UTC, sighoya wrote:
Is there any PM mechanism on board, no?
You mean does Slack have private messages? Yes it does.
No I meant, if this board has such options, don't like to
On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 13:37:38 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Any dlang slack member can invite new members by their email (I
think even temporary email addresses are fine). On which email
shall I send you an invite?
Is there any PM mechanism on board, no?
On Sunday, 31 January 2021 at 20:36:43 UTC, aberba wrote:
It's finally out!
https://opensource.com/article/21/1/d-scripting
Thanks for your work, nice article, I wasn't even aware how easy
this is.
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 16:01:03 UTC, bauss wrote:
There is no way to determine the import statements either as
those themselves can be generated at compile-time.
Question: is then DMD capable to add generated source code in
separate files to the compilation process when we can just
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 12:38:47 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 12:32:35 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 04:54:19 UTC, 9il wrote:
[...]
I have been using SumType [1] for a while in some of my
projects and I'm quite happy
20 matches
Mail list logo
