On 2020-05-05 21:41:39 +, Dmitry Olshansky said:
Felt a bit like cheating. Russian traditions preclude taking money for things
you (think you) wanted to do anyway.
Well, that's a good habit and still IMO it's OK to offer and take an incentive.
I started on it, and it turned out a bit
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 21:41:39 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 20:11:44 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
On 2020-05-05 15:39:12 +, Dmitry Olshansky said:
On the other hand, if you can help someone to get started and
it's a couple of hours, I would expect people to be
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 20:11:44 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
On 2020-05-05 15:39:12 +, Dmitry Olshansky said:
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?"
post in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this
On 2020-05-05 15:39:12 +, Dmitry Olshansky said:
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post in D
group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for "Issue 16416
- Phobos std.uni out of date (should
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
...
I believe this is an excellent initiative, thank you for starting
it!
Perhaps this script, along with repository that is part of can
help those wishing to update std.uni to the latest version:
On 05.05.20 17:39, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I'm guess I'm not eligible for the bounty ;)
Why wouldn't you be eligible? If it's an easy fix for you, that's just
because you've got the needed expert knowledge. And that's valuable.
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post
in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for
"Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to
latest Unicode standard)" [1]
For me,
On 05/05/2020 9:05 PM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
On 2020-05-04 21:34:27 +, rikki cattermole said:
On 05/05/2020 7:26 AM, notna wrote:
Maybe you want to add an additional constraint... It would be great
if this would result in a tool, scripts or at least a
simple-to-follow to-do (say
On 2020-05-04 21:34:27 +, rikki cattermole said:
On 05/05/2020 7:26 AM, notna wrote:
Maybe you want to add an additional constraint... It would be great if
this would result in a tool, scripts or at least a simple-to-follow
to-do (say Wiki?!)... so best case we could use this also for the
On 2020-05-04 21:14:49 +, welkam said:
If changes to phobos do not bring breaking changes then I dont see how
update to std.uni might not be merged
Well, but that's a weak statement for an invest.
If unicode is developing in a way that results in breaking changes,
what to do? Never
On 05/05/2020 7:26 AM, notna wrote:
Maybe you want to add an additional constraint... It would be great if
this would result in a tool, scripts or at least a simple-to-follow
to-do (say Wiki?!)... so best case we could use this also for the next
updates / releases in the future?!
It wouldn't
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:30:41 UTC, Arine wrote:
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Besides getting the work done, there is one constraint: The
work needs to get into Phobos. It doesn't make sense to have
it sit around, because it's not being merged. I don't have
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post
in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for
"Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to
latest Unicode standard)" [1]
So, I'm
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 19:26:28 UTC, notna wrote:
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?"
post in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this
effort for "Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should
be
On 2020-05-04 17:30:41 +, Arine said:
I feel like this is going to be the biggest obstacle. I worked on a bug
bounty in the past, made a pull request, and it just sat there for
months. It's a waste of time to try and get anything merged. Especially
on the scale that this would be at.
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Besides getting the work done, there is one constraint: The
work needs to get into Phobos. It doesn't make sense to have it
sit around, because it's not being merged. I don't have any
clue who is in charge, who decides this. Or if
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post in D
group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for "Issue 16416
- Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode
standard)" [1]
For me, this, too, is an experiment to find out if it's possible to
17 matches
Mail list logo
