On 2012-03-04 16:13, Gour wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:40:20 +0100
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
DStep is currently used only for automatically generating bindings
for C functions and Objective-C classes and methods.
Do oyu find that dstep is capable to be used for binding whole C libs
instead of u
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:40:20 +0100
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> DStep is currently used only for automatically generating bindings
> for C functions and Objective-C classes and methods.
Do oyu find that dstep is capable to be used for binding whole C libs
instead of using SWIG?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:54:19 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
> OK, I'm here again. Jacob Carlborg is right - CWrap is a different
> tool so it's incorrect to compare it with SWIG/dstep. It's developed
> as a high performance backend for other tools or for manual wrapping
> a couple of functions,
On 2012-02-22 19:59, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
22.02.2012 13:41, Gour пишет:
That would be nice and make the whole job of binding C functions and
providing customized D API easier...and let's not forget about extra
points for coordinating work. ;)
I'm open for emails about using/changing/fixin
22.02.2012 13:41, Gour пишет:
That would be nice and make the whole job of binding C functions and
providing customized D API easier...and let's not forget about extra
points for coordinating work. ;)
I'm open for emails about using/changing/fixing CWrap.
20.02.2012 19:34, Gour пишет:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:02:49 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Hello Denis,
D has complete (IMHO) compiler support for calling C functions (using
extern(C)). But there is a lack of library support.
I'm glad you're working on (another) bindings tool being aware th
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:40:20 +0100
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> DStep is currently used only for automatically generating bindings
> for C functions and Objective-C classes and methods.
OK. Thank you.
> But it depends what code I output, I could change dstep to output
> code that uses CWrap.
That w
On 2012-02-21 13:12, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:52:04 +0100
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As I understand it, CWrap provides more than just bindings for a C
function.
Right, but, afaik, SWIG can also make more than wrapper for a C function
by using typemaps, %exception etc.
Does it mean tha
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:52:04 +0100
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> As I understand it, CWrap provides more than just bindings for a C
> function.
Right, but, afaik, SWIG can also make more than wrapper for a C function
by using typemaps, %exception etc.
Does it mean that dstep is only tool for wrappi
On 2012-02-20 16:34, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:02:49 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Hello Denis,
D has complete (IMHO) compiler support for calling C functions (using
extern(C)). But there is a lack of library support.
I'm glad you're working on (another) bindings tool being aware
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:02:49 +0400
Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Hello Denis,
> D has complete (IMHO) compiler support for calling C functions (using
> extern(C)). But there is a lack of library support.
I'm glad you're working on (another) bindings tool being aware that it's
not reasonable that
D has complete (IMHO) compiler support for calling C functions (using
extern(C)). But there is a lack of library support. Microsoft .NET
Framework has such support, but it's poor (see previous thread about
CWrap in digitalmars.D NG).
Once original function is properly described in IDL, CWrap g
12 matches
Mail list logo
