On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 14:41:38 UTC, burjui wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 05:57:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Even more than that, I would also suggest to remove anonymous
auto-typed enums
without an initial value from which type can be inferred, e.g.:
[...]
Again,
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 05:57:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I've realized that with a nested anonymous enum, there is no
need to (and no way of) mentioning the enum type inside a
user-defined type. This can simplify the implementation:
Only if you intend to use enum members as manifest
On 12/28/2015 04:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3ykko7/implementing_a_programming_language_in_d_lexical/
Although the author does not use many D idioms, I've just learned
(re-learned?) anonymous enums from that code.
I've realized that with a
http://blog.felixangell.com/implementing-a-programming-language-in-d-part-1/
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3ykko7/implementing_a_programming_language_in_d_lexical/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10802610 (Go through the front page, not
this link, or your votes won't
On 12/28/2015 09:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> anonymous enums
Wow! They are pretty weird:
1) The second form of the AnonymousEnumDeclaration spec is redundant, right?
http://dlang.org/spec/enum.html#AnonymousEnumDeclaration
enum : EnumBaseType { EnumMembers }
enum { EnumMembers }
