On 08/18/2018 06:47 PM, kinke wrote:
> Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
>
> * Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to WebAssembly.
> See the dedicated Wiki page [1] for how to get started.
Nice one!
> [1] https://wiki.dlang.org/Generating_WebAssembly_with_LDC
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:47:35 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly
On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 12:21:32 UTC, Uknown wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 15:31:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
[...]
I tried looking for a RISC-V VPS or dev board recently and
found basically nothing, just two boards from SiFive that
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 15:31:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
[...]
I tried looking for a RISC-V VPS or dev board recently and
found basically nothing, just two boards from SiFive that are
too small or too expensive.
There is the SHAKTI Pro
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 09:51:30 UTC, Brian wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 15:31:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Many thanks for your effort!
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be
mature enough on AArch64 and RISC-
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 15:31:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Many thanks for your effort!
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be
mature enough on AArch64 and RISC-V for production environment.
Who is actually running AAr
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Many thanks for your effort!
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be
mature enough on AArch64 and RISC-V for production environment.
Who is actually running AArch64 or RISC-V in a "production
environment?" Maybe a few
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:56:28 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
[...]
Does that Git has thing work if there is no Git involved? ;-)
[...]
Ewww, looks like I can't write today...
At the moment, we get
```
LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.8.0):
based on DMD v2.078.3 and LLVM 5.0.2
built with LD
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:48:15 UTC, kinke wrote:
[...]
The used host compiler, incl. git hash if untagged, can be
found in the --version output:
```
LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.12.0git-1c87fd7):
based on DMD v2.082.0 and LLVM 6.0.0
built with LDC - the LLVM D compiler (0.17.6git-79
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:36:07 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
The thing is, a release is actually tremendously helpful for
the Debian packaging - we are using the latest tagged version
there for ages.
I could, if you think that it is a good idea, just use a
snapshot of the current ltsmaster
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be
mature enough on AArch64 and RISC-V for production environment.
Hope is good, contributing better. ;) AArch64 needs polishing,
wading through the logs and analyzing & fixing (or
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 12:23:37 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 21:05:42 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
Will we get a release of the ltsmaster branch as well? From
the release notes it sounds like building with a more recent
version is a good idea...
Using latest ltsmaster
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 21:05:42 UTC, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
Will we get a release of the ltsmaster branch as well? From the
release notes it sounds like building with a more recent
version is a good idea...
Using latest ltsmaster is always a good idea. I'm a bit reluctant
to tag a new
Many thanks for your effort!
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be mature
enough on AArch64 and RISC-V for production environment.
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:47:35 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:47:35 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including additional
cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to
WebAssembly. See the dedicated Wiki page [1] for how to
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 19:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.11.
* Based on D 2.081.1+ (today's DMD stable).
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary sup
On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 at 00:47:49 UTC, Dennis wrote:
This is really awesome! I tried the examples, is there any
other documentation about it currently? I tried passing strings
instead of numbers to the callback, but it passes the length as
a number only. I doesn't work with char pointers e
On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 at 01:35:11 UTC, Ali wrote:
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 19:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.11.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Ru
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 19:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.11.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to
W
On Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 19:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to
WebAssembly. See the dedicated Wiki page [1] for how to get
started.
This is really awesome! I tried the examples, is there any other
documentation about it currently? I tried passi
Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.11.
* Based on D 2.081.1+ (today's DMD stable).
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including additional
cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to
WebAssembly. S
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 18:26:45 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 18:17:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
Would be great to include
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8456 as it's a serious
regression and the reason for the early 2.081.1 release.
Because the quality of new DMD rele
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 18:17:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
Would be great to include
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8456 as it's a serious
regression and the reason for the early 2.081.1 release.
Because the quality of new DMD releases is often subpar, the LDC
release plan is to only release a
On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 20:38:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.11.
* Based on D 2.081.0.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
Full release log and downloads:
htt
Thx for the rationale; I may have a look at it over the weekend.
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 09:40:46 UTC, kinke wrote:
I failed to see a benefit from being able to use classes with
static members only (abuse as namespace?)
Yeah, pretty much, but also static inheritance. You can see the
pattern where I use it at
https://github.com/JinShil/stm32f42_discov
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 10:57:17 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I failed to see a benefit from being able to use classes with
static members only (abuse as namespace?)
Yeah, pretty much, but also static inheritance. You can see
the pattern where I use it at
https://github.com/JinShil/stm32f4
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 08:55:00 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I notice the minimal2.d test from the DMD test suite is
disabled:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/dmd-testsuite/blob/977ef0696f7941357385925c07617544c3527f4c/runnable/minimal2.d#L5
How permanent/temporary is that? Is there some
On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 20:38:54 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.11.
Thanks for all the work on this.
I notice the minimal2.d test from the DMD test suite is disabled:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/dmd-testsuite/blob/977ef0696f7941357385925c07617544c3527
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.11.
* Based on D 2.081.0.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including additional
cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and WebAssembly).
Full release log and downloads:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.11.0-be
31 matches
Mail list logo
