On Sunday, 18 November 2018 at 04:38:57 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Damn, you're right. Actually i didn't try your stuff at all and
instead used callgrind intuitively. Bad advice was here:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8945#issuecomment-439388332.
Also along the thread there was discussion about
On Sunday, 18 November 2018 at 01:12:04 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 23:01:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I put a start to the project then today i remembered
callgrind...
What are the pros and cons in comparison with callgrind ? By
coincidence i had to callgrind
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 23:01:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
I put a start to the project then today i remembered
callgrind...
What are the pros and cons in comparison with callgrind ? By
coincidence i had to callgrind dmd today and got answers to a
performance issue in a very straight
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 18:00:22 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
around to finishing / publishing until today.
https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
Hopefully someone will find it useful.
I put a start to the
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 12:36:30 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Just in case, did you disable your anti-virus first?
Had to edit registry to turn that thing off and it still some
times popup. Microsoft is so annoying.
https://imgur.com/a/x3cKjZm
On 18/11/2018 1:29 AM, welkam wrote:
I just updated DMD on my windows and tried to compile hello world. It
took 7.4 sec. Something is not right. Can anyone reproduce? On the same
mashine running linux it compiles and runs in 0.1 sec
PS C:\Users\Welkam\Desktop\Projects> Measure-Command {dmd
I just updated DMD on my windows and tried to compile hello
world. It took 7.4 sec. Something is not right. Can anyone
reproduce? On the same mashine running linux it compiles and runs
in 0.1 sec
PS C:\Users\Welkam\Desktop\Projects> Measure-Command {dmd -run
main.d}
Days : 0
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 06:21:20 UTC, Manu wrote:
What was the batch size for module grouping?
I just use dmd -i, which compiles everything at once (except
Phobos/Druntime).
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:00 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 19:18:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > I'm not sure how VisualStudio (read: MSBuild) should behave
> > differently than make?
> > It's not like the build script is taking a long time,
On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 19:18:27 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure how VisualStudio (read: MSBuild) should behave
differently than make?
It's not like the build script is taking a long time, it's the
invocation of DMD that takes 100% of that time.
That seems to take about half the time
Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > And all builds are release builds... what good is a debug
> > build? DMD
> > is unbelievably slow in debug. If it wasn't already slow
> > enough...
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
And all builds are release builds... what good is a debug
build? DMD
is unbelievably slow in debug. If it wasn't already slow
enough... if
I try and build with a debug build, it takes closer to 5
minutes.
I just got to try a
On 09/11/2018 00:12, kinke wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 20:19:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> Sounds like we're narrowing it down to the Visual Studio solution.
>
> Mildly interested, I gave DMD master a shot with my 5-years old i5-3550
> (@4 GHz) in VS 2017 (+ a recent Visual
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 20:19:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Sounds like we're narrowing it down to the Visual Studio
solution.
Mildly interested, I gave DMD master a shot with my 5-years old
i5-3550 (@4 GHz) in VS 2017 (+ a recent Visual D beta):
DMD v2.083.0-beta1 host compiler
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 20:19:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 19:07:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
21 seconds on a Windows 10 virtual machine compiling using the
win32.mak file.
Sounds like we're narrowing it down to the Visual Studio
solution.
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 19:07:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
21 seconds on a Windows 10 virtual machine compiling using the
win32.mak file.
Sounds like we're narrowing it down to the Visual Studio solution.
On 2018-11-08 18:25, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is my result on macOS:
$ $ make -f posix.mak clean
$ time make -f posix.mak -j 16
real 0m3.127s
user 0m5.478s
sys 0m1.686s
21 seconds on a Windows 10 virtual machine compiling using the win32.mak
file.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 2018-11-08 05:16, Manu wrote:
>
> > 4 seconds? That's just untrue. D is actually kinda slow these
> > days... In my experience it's slower than modern C++ compilers by
> > quite a lot.
>
> This is
On 2018-11-08 05:16, Manu wrote:
4 seconds? That's just untrue. D is actually kinda slow these days...
In my experience it's slower than modern C++ compilers by quite a lot.
This is my result on macOS:
$ $ make -f posix.mak clean
$ time make -f posix.mak -j 16
real0m3.127s
user
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
https://youtu.be/msWuRlD3zy0
DMD only builds with one core, since it builds altogether.
And all builds are release builds... what good is a debug
build? DMD
is unbelievably slow in debug. If it wasn't already slow
enough... if
I try
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
> It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few
> years at
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 19:01:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It looks like it would be really useful one day when I try to
tackle the dmd-on-lowmem-system problem again.
Based on my profiling it seems that most memory is allocated in
void importAll(Scope* sc) found in attrib.d . A person
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
around to finishing / publishing until today.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:55 AM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 08:29:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >
> >
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 08:29:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
> Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
>>
>> On
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 11/7/2018 11:41 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I'm on an i7 with 8 threads and plenty of ram... although threads are
> > useless, since DMD only uses one ;)
>
> So does every other compiler.
>
> To do a multicore build,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
> It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few
> years at
On 11/7/2018 11:41 PM, Manu wrote:
I'm on an i7 with 8 threads and plenty of ram... although threads are
useless, since DMD only uses one ;)
So does every other compiler.
To do a multicore build, you'll need to use a makefile that supports -j.
On 11/7/2018 10:08 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
It does seem to take more time now; I wonder why.
That's easy. It's because nobody has profiled it for years.
Another reason is the backend being in D now, it is being compiled with DMD
rather than gcc/clang.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:55 PM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:41:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> >> >
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
> wrote:
> > It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few years
> > at most.
>
> No, it's still 4 seconds.
>
> digger --offline
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:41:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
>> [...]
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > "Indeed, a clean build of DMD itself (about
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:10 PM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > ...what!? DMD takes me... (compiling) ... 1 minute 40 seconds
> > to build! And because DMD does all-files-at-once compilation,
> > rather than
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[...]
"Indeed, a clean build of DMD itself (about 170’000 lines of D
and 120’000 lines of C/C++) takes no longer than 4 seconds to
build on a
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few years
at most.
No, it's still 4 seconds.
digger --offline --config-file=/dev/null -j auto -c
local.cache=none build 7.31s user 1.51s system 203% cpu 4.340
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote:
...what!? DMD takes me... (compiling) ... 1 minute 40 seconds
to build! And because DMD does all-files-at-once compilation,
rather than separate compilation for each source file, whenever
you change just one line in one file, you incur
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> around to finishing / publishing until today.
>
> https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
>
> Hopefully someone will find it useful.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:18 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:16 PM Manu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> > > around to finishing /
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:16 PM Manu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> >
> > This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> > around to finishing / publishing until today.
> >
> >
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:35:29 +1300, rikki cattermole wrote:
> Its a symptom of a larger set of problems. The frontend is not quite
> ready to have the GC turned on full time.
>
> Based upon my testing, that little memory leak prevents pretty much
> *all* memory allocated by the GC to not be
On 08/11/2018 4:17 AM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:49:49 +1300, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 08/11/2018 1:46 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
Now that the compiler is completely in D, wouldn't it be a good idea to
activate the GC in the compiler. I know that it requires some care for
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:49:49 +1300, rikki cattermole wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 1:46 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
>> Now that the compiler is completely in D, wouldn't it be a good idea to
>> activate the GC in the compiler. I know that it requires some care for
>> bootstrapping the compiler when there
On 08/11/2018 1:46 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
Now that the compiler is completely in D, wouldn't it be a good idea to
activate the GC in the compiler. I know that it requires some care for
bootstrapping the compiler when there are dependencies to the D runtime,
but the compiler would be an
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:44:41PM +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 18:00:22 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
> This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
> around
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:44:41PM +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 18:00:22 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got around
> > to finishing / publishing until today.
> >
> >
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 18:00:22 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
around to finishing / publishing until today.
https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
Hopefully someone will find it useful.
Awesome, great work!
I
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 19:01:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I don't have the time to look into this right now, but at a
cursory glance, WOW. This is awesome! It looks like it would
be really useful one day when I try to tackle the
dmd-on-lowmem-system problem again. This will greatly help
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:00:22PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got around to
> finishing / publishing until today.
>
> https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
>
> Hopefully someone will find it
This is a tool + article I wrote in February, but never got
around to finishing / publishing until today.
https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2018/02/07/dmdprof/
Hopefully someone will find it useful.
51 matches
Mail list logo
