On Sunday, 15 May 2022 at 06:37:08 UTC, frame wrote:
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 23:23:47 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Which kind of socket exception could be triggered by a client?
Andrea
It doesn't matter if triggered by a client or not, you need to
deal with the possibility. A closed/destr
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 23:23:47 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Which kind of socket exception could be triggered by a client?
Andrea
It doesn't matter if triggered by a client or not, you need to
deal with the possibility. A closed/destroyed socket is an
invalid resource.
I recently had
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 20:44:54 UTC, frame wrote:
Take care of socket exceptions - especially if you want to make
a port to Windows.
You should always expect one. It's not enough to test
`Socket.isAlive` - a client socket may be faulty and any
illegal socket operation throws and kills yo
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Please help me testing it, I'm looking forward to receiving
your shiny new issues on github.
Dub package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/serverino
Andrea
Take care of socket exceptions - especially if you want to make a
port to
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 11:46:05 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 11:33:07 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Does dmd/rdmd work? Serverino uses std.net.curl just for
running its unittests, so maybe that bug is not blocking.
Well tbh, the simple fact that I would have to
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 11:33:07 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Does dmd/rdmd work? Serverino uses std.net.curl just for
running its unittests, so maybe that bug is not blocking.
Well tbh, the simple fact that I would have to use WSL is a
blocker for me.
AFAIK vibe or cgi.d do not require t
On 12/05/2022 11:33 PM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Too bad dub doesn't work with wsl, it sounds like a lost opportunity.
Does dmd/rdmd work? Serverino uses std.net.curl just for running its
unittests, so maybe that bug is not blocking.
It doesn't look like it is dub that is failing.
This is a p
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 10:26:28 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:45:28 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
If you can test it on windows with WSL, that would be
appreciated a lot!
I tried to test servrino on WSL, but dub doesn't run on WSL.
=> https://github.com/dlang/d
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:45:28 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
If you can test it on windows with WSL, that would be
appreciated a lot!
I tried to test servrino on WSL, but dub doesn't run on WSL.
=> https://github.com/dlang/dub/issues/2249
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 19:24:25 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Maybe bambinetto is more about immaturity. Bambinuccio is cute.
Bambinaccio is bad. Bambinone is big (an adult that behave like
a child). -ello doesn't sound good with bambino, but it's very
similar to -etto.
Good luck :)
Thanks
On Wednesday, 11 May 2022 at 06:50:37 UTC, Orfeo wrote:
well done Andrea!
(forum begins to be too crowded with Italians :) )
---
Orfeo
We all miss the good old bearophile!
I think the most active italian in this forum.
Andrea
well done Andrea!
(forum begins to be too crowded with Italians :) )
---
Orfeo
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 21:24:46 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Here I am ... Milanese: https://www.deepglance.com/about
/Paolo
Ok it's me getting old!
Andrea
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 20:41:17 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 20:13:45 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Sinceramente non ricordo di averlo scritto, ma alla mia eta
... probabilmente dimentico qualcosa ... comunque piacere! E'
bello vedere altri italiani apprezzare questo
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 20:13:45 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Sinceramente non ricordo di averlo scritto, ma alla mia eta ...
probabilmente dimentico qualcosa ... comunque piacere! E' bello
vedere altri italiani apprezzare questo magnifico linguaggio!
(Frankly speaking, I don't remember to
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 19:55:32 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 19:50:08 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Concordo ... (I agree!)
:-P
Wait, you have always said you're not Italian. Have you changed
your mind?
Andrea
Sinceramente non ricordo di averlo scritto, ma al
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 19:50:08 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Concordo ... (I agree!)
:-P
Wait, you have always said you're not Italian. Have you changed
your mind?
Andrea
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 16:05:11 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:35:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:27:48 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Indeed the "-ino" suffix in "serverino" stands for "small" in
italian. :)
Bambino > bambinello? So,
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 18:33:18 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 10:49:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 08:32:15 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
The difference is that with the route uda you can *only* map
routes 1:1 exhaustively. With your approa
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 16:47:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 16:05:11 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Oh, italian is full of suffixes. -ello means a slightly
different thing. It's small but sounds like a bit pejorative.
Oh, and I loved the sound of it… suggests imm
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 10:49:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 08:32:15 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
The difference is that with the route uda you can *only* map
routes 1:1 exhaustively. With your approach it is up to the
programmer to avoid errors. It is also hard to
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 16:05:11 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Oh, italian is full of suffixes. -ello means a slightly
different thing. It's small but sounds like a bit pejorative.
Oh, and I loved the sound of it… suggests immaturity, perhaps?
(I love the -ello and -ella endings. «Bambinella»
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:35:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:27:48 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Indeed the "-ino" suffix in "serverino" stands for "small" in
italian. :)
Bambino > bambinello? So, the embedded-version could be
«serverinello»? :O)
Oh, italia
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:27:48 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Indeed the "-ino" suffix in "serverino" stands for "small" in
italian. :)
Bambino > bambinello? So, the embedded-version could be
«serverinello»? :O)
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:16:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:00:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I work in the R&D and every single time I even have to write a
small api or a simple html interface to control some strange
machine I think "omg, I have to set ngin
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:00:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I work in the R&D and every single time I even have to write a
small api or a simple html interface to control some strange
machine I think "omg, I have to set nginx agaain".
Good point, there are more application areas than re
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 15:01:43 UTC, Adam Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 19:20:27 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Thank you. Looking forward to getting feedback, bug reports
and help :)
BTW I'm curious, what made you not want to use my cgi.d which
has similar capabilities?
I was reall
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 19:20:27 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Thank you. Looking forward to getting feedback, bug reports and
help :)
BTW I'm curious, what made you not want to use my cgi.d which has
similar capabilities?
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 13:15:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 12:52:01 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I'm running a whole website in D using fastcgi and we have no
problem at all, it's blazing fast. But it's not so easy to
setup as serverino :)
Easy setup is proba
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 13:34:27 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:37:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
The same goes for cgi/fastcgi/scgi and so on.
Well, cgi does one process per request, so there is no worker
pool (it is the original "serverless" lol).
fastcgi is intere
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:37:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
The same goes for cgi/fastcgi/scgi and so on.
Well, cgi does one process per request, so there is no worker
pool (it is the original "serverless" lol).
fastcgi is interesting because the Apache module for it will
actually start an
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 12:52:01 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I'm running a whole website in D using fastcgi and we have no
problem at all, it's blazing fast. But it's not so easy to
setup as serverino :)
Easy setup is probably the number one reason people land on a
specific web-tech, so it
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 12:31:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 10:49:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
And you can still handle 700k/views per hour with 20 workers!
Requests tend to come in bursts from the same client, thanks to
clunky javascript APIs and clutters
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 10:49:06 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
And you can still handle 700k/views per hour with 20 workers!
Requests tend to come in bursts from the same client, thanks to
clunky javascript APIs and clutters of resources (and careless
web developers). For a typical D user eas
On Tuesday, 10 May 2022 at 08:32:15 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:37:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:08:38 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
As an example, how many requests per second can you manage if
all requests have to wait 100 msecs?
For n
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:37:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:08:38 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
As an example, how many requests per second can you manage if
all requests have to wait 100 msecs?
For non critical workload you will probably still hit good
enough perf
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 20:08:38 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Every request is processed by a worker running in an isolated
process, no fibers/threads, sorry (or thanks?)
I did some tests and the performance sounds good: on a local
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Every request is processed by a worker running in an isolated
process, no fibers/threads, sorry (or thanks?)
I did some tests and the performance sounds good: on a local
machine it can handle more than 100_000 reqs/sec for a simple
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 19:09:40 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Hello!
I've just released serverino. It's a small & ready-to-go
http/https server.
Dub package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/serverino
Andrea
Looks very useful, c
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Hello!
I've just released serverino. It's a small & ready-to-go
http/https server.
Dub package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/serverino
Andrea
Looks very useful, congratulations!
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:48:11PM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 16:37:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Why is memory protection the only way to implement write barriers in
> > D?
>
> Well, it's the only way I know of without making it a major
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 16:37:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Why is memory protection the only way to implement write
barriers in D?
Well, it's the only way I know of without making it a major
backwards-incompatible change. The main restriction in this area
is that it must continue working with c
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 05:55:39AM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 00:25:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > In the past, the argument was that write barriers represented an
> > unacceptable performance hit to D code. But I don't think this has
> >
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 05:52:30AM +, Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 23:44:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > While we are on topic :) and as I finally understood what
> > generational GC is[1], are there any fundamental issues with D to
> > not use
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 00:25:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In the past, the argument was that write barriers represented
an unacceptable performance hit to D code. But I don't think
this has ever actually been measured. (Or has it?) Maybe
somebody should make a dmd fork that introduces write ba
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 23:44:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
While we are on topic :) and as I finally understood what
generational GC is[1], are there any fundamental issues with D
to not use one?
I implemented one a long time ago. The only way to get write
barriers with D is memory protection.
On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 00:32:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/8/22 17:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> somebody should make a dmd
> fork that introduces write barriers, plus a generational GC
(even if
> it's a toy, proof-of-concept-only implementation) to see if
the
> performance hit is really as bad as
On 5/8/22 17:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> somebody should make a dmd
> fork that introduces write barriers, plus a generational GC (even if
> it's a toy, proof-of-concept-only implementation) to see if the
> performance hit is really as bad as believed to be.
Ooh! DConf is getting even more interesti
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 12:10:53PM +1200, rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 09/05/2022 11:44 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > While we are on topic :) and as I finally understood what
> > generational GC is[1], are there any fundamental issues with D to
> > not use one?
>
> This i
On 09/05/2022 11:44 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
While we are on topic :) and as I finally understood what generational
GC is[1], are there any fundamental issues with D to not use one?
This is not a D issue, its an implementation one.
We don't have write barriers, that's it.
Make them opt-in and
On 5/8/22 16:10, Adam Ruppe wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 22:09:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> That effectively uses multiple GCs. I always suspected that approach
>> would provide better latency.
>
> My cgi.d has used some fork approaches for a very long time since it is
> a very simple way to
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 22:09:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
That effectively uses multiple GCs. I always suspected that
approach would provide better latency.
My cgi.d has used some fork approaches for a very long time since
it is a very simple way to spread this out, it works quite well.
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 22:09:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Congratulations! :) Looking forward to watching your
presentation at DConf... ;)
I wish I was able to speak publicly in English in front of an
audience :)
On 5/8/22 14:32, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> Every request is processed by a wor
Congratulations! :) Looking forward to watching your presentation at
DConf... ;)
On 5/8/22 14:32, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> Every request is processed by a worker running in an isolated process,
> no fibers/threads, sorry (or thanks?)
That effectively uses multiple GCs. I always suspected that a
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 21:32:42 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
[...]
Andrea
Whoops, I forgot a couple of things. This was tested on linux
only and it should work fine on other posix systems (macOS
included!).
I don't have windows, but I think you need WSL to run it, since
I'm using a lot of
Hello!
I've just released serverino. It's a small & ready-to-go
http/https server.
Every request is processed by a worker running in an isolated
process, no fibers/threads, sorry (or thanks?)
I did some tests and the performance sounds good: on a local
machine it can handle more than 100_0
56 matches
Mail list logo
