On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 20:05:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Would it be easier to submit a approved conflict of interest
paper with the application?
All I'm saying is that each applicant is responsible for making
sure they are free and clear to participate. If you have an
employment contr
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 13:50:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 13:36:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 03:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Second, it is incumbent upon non-student applicants who are
currently employed by a software development firm to
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 13:36:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 03:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Second, it is incumbent upon non-student applicants who are
currently employed by a software development firm to ensure
there are no contractual barriers to participating.
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 03:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Second, it is incumbent upon non-student applicants who are
currently employed by a software development firm to ensure
there are no contractual barriers to participating.
That seems risky - an employer may claim ownership of those
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 03:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've updated the SAoC page to reflect the decision to accept
applications from non-university students.
Great! I think this will open up the pool of applicants
considerably.
I've updated the SAoC page to reflect the decision to accept
applications from non-university students. I want to make two
things very clear.
First, preference will be given to university students who can
provide proof of enrollment. That's not to say that their
applications will automaticall
