On 22.12.2009 1:44, Georg Wrede wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Most of the code is
written with a "get it to work - NOW" philoshophy, and as such there is
a lot of potential for improvement and polish, not least when it comes
to performance. I am aware of this, so there is really no need
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Most of the code is
written with a "get it to work - NOW" philoshophy, and as such there is
a lot of potential for improvement and polish, not least when it comes
to performance. I am aware of this, so there is really no need to
benchmark it against established scien
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>
>> Biggest problem with OpenGL is that the quality is crap for 2D stuff,
>> and quality really matters when you're trying to do something like
>> draw 2000 little markers on a plot and each is only 5 pixels wide.
>>
>>
Bill Baxter wrote:
Biggest problem with OpenGL is that the quality is crap for 2D stuff,
and quality really matters when you're trying to do something like
draw 2000 little markers on a plot and each is only 5 pixels wide.
Best you can do right now with GL without a lot of contortions is
somet
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
dsimcha Wrote:
Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it needs to
be
put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably stable.
One
layer of instability (D2 it
dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from Chad J (chadj...@__spam.is.bad__gmail.com)'s article
>> Is it really that hard to have the GUI libs in question just give you
>> some pixels in memory or an opengl context? Then you could use your own
>> highly optimized plot drawing routines instead of relying on th
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Lutger wrote:
> Chad J wrote:
>
>> dsimcha wrote:
>>>
>>> ... The other option is to make
>>> sure everything is loosely coupled to the GUI lib so it can be easily
>>> swapped for
>>> another one. The downside is that this has some tradeoffs in terms of
>>> simpl
dsimcha wrote:
>> Is it really that hard to have the GUI libs in question just give you
>> some pixels in memory or an opengl context? Then you could use your own
>> highly optimized plot drawing routines instead of relying on the GUI lib
>> to do this. I figured this kind of thing would be unbea
Is it really that hard to have the GUI libs in question just give you
some pixels in memory or an opengl context? Then you could use your
own highly optimized plot drawing routines instead of relying on the
GUI lib to do this. I figured this kind of thing would be unbeatable
for performance, unl
== Quote from Chad J (chadj...@__spam.is.bad__gmail.com)'s article
> dsimcha wrote:
> >
> > ... The other option is to make
> > sure everything is loosely coupled to the GUI lib so it can be easily
> > swapped for
> > another one. The downside is that this has some tradeoffs in terms of
> > sim
Lutger wrote:
> Chad J wrote:
>
>> dsimcha wrote:
>>>
>>> ... The other option is to make
>>> sure everything is loosely coupled to the GUI lib so it can be easily
>>> swapped for
>>> another one. The downside is that this has some tradeoffs in terms of
>>> simplicity and probably performance
Chad J wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>>
>> ... The other option is to make
>> sure everything is loosely coupled to the GUI lib so it can be easily
>> swapped for
>> another one. The downside is that this has some tradeoffs in terms of
>> simplicity and probably performance that I don't think I want
dsimcha wrote:
>
> ... The other option is to make
> sure everything is loosely coupled to the GUI lib so it can be easily swapped
> for
> another one. The downside is that this has some tradeoffs in terms of
> simplicity
> and probably performance that I don't think I want to make and is prob
dsimcha wrote:
We've got the beginnings of a good matrix/numerics lib in your work. I believe
that my dstats lib would provide just about all the statistical functionality a
good scientific lib would need, and I'm getting close to declaring it
beta-quality. I'd say based on a quick look at what
== Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
> dsimcha Wrote:
> > == Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
> > > dsimcha Wrote:
> > > > Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it
needs to be
> > > > put off until D2 i
dsimcha Wrote:
> == Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
> > dsimcha Wrote:
> > > Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it
> > > needs to be
> > > put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably
> > > stable. One
== Quote from Eldar Insafutdinov (e.insafutdi...@gmail.com)'s article
> dsimcha Wrote:
> > Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it
> > needs to be
> > put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably
> > stable. One
> > layer of instability (D2
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Lars T. Kyllingstad (pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet)'s article
I've just created a new dsource project and uploaded my collection of
numerical routines. You can find it here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scid
Hopefully others will find it useful as well. Most of th
dsimcha Wrote:
> Plotting. I've considered doing this a few times, but I've decided it needs
> to be
> put off until D2 is stable and the GUI toolkits for it are reasonably stable.
> One
> layer of instability (D2 itself) is workable, but two layers (D2 and the GUI
> libs)
> is not.
>
It wo
== Quote from Lars T. Kyllingstad (pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet)'s article
> I've just created a new dsource project and uploaded my collection of
> numerical routines. You can find it here:
>http://www.dsource.org/projects/scid
> Hopefully others will find it useful as well. Most of the code is
I've just created a new dsource project and uploaded my collection of
numerical routines. You can find it here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scid
Hopefully others will find it useful as well. Most of the code is
written with a "get it to work - NOW" philoshophy, and as such there is
a lo
21 matches
Mail list logo
