Robert Clipsham:
> Now that it's set up for ldc, it would be very easy to set it up for dmd
> if Walter is willing to put it under version control.
Very good idea, it will improve the improvement process.
Let's suggest it to Walter.
Bye,
bearophile
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
If dmd had public source control, we could set up continuous
integration for it that will, for instance, run dstress and attempt to
compile the latest release of various common libraries. Then Walter
can just check its results when he wants to d
Holy bugfixes, Batman! It took me ten minutes to skip through all the
"fixed in dmd1.045" / "fixed in dmd2.030" messages. I'm so happy...
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
Seems like D2 is still semi-usable on Mac OS X Tiger,
after recompilation. (official binary is Leopard-only)
Besides for some low-hanging fruit like missing versions
and need to upda
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:25:20 +, dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
>> dsimcha wrote:
>> > Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not
>> > supposed to be implemented yet?
>> The implementation of the synchronization of share
BCS wrote:
> that would also make setting up RPM/DEB genation something walter
dosn't
> need to worry about.
>
This have already been done for ldc.
Have a look at
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/wiki/WikiStart#Ubuntuldcandldcdailypackages
And at https://launchpad.net/~d-language-packager
Hello Robert,
If Walter is willing to put dmd under public source control I'd
happily set this up to automatically compile dmd, run tests suites,
compile libraries etc. I could even set up a one command/one click
release candidate/final release thing if needed (maybe even nightly
builds too).
I write a fiber scheduler use threads,segfault accur on the code,what's the
matter? thanks!
private import core.thread;
private import std.stdio;
private class SyncQueue(T)
{
private T[] queue;
public synchronized void push(T o)
{
queue ~= o;
}
public synchronized T
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I can't access to this URL right now, it is really working?
Yes, sorry, I picked the perfect time to make a post... I started doing
some upgrades to my server about 20 minutes after posting this :P
It is back up now.
That would be great. What would be the excuse no
Robert Clipsham, el 14 de mayo a las 13:11 me escribiste:
> Christopher Wright wrote:
> >If dmd had public source control, we could set up continuous integration for
> >it
> >that will, for instance, run dstress and attempt to compile the latest
> >release
> >of various common libraries. Then W
Christopher Wright wrote:
If dmd had public source control, we could set up continuous integration
for it that will, for instance, run dstress and attempt to compile the
latest release of various common libraries. Then Walter can just check
its results when he wants to do a release -- depending
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Christopher Wright, el 12 de mayo a las 19:14 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prer
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
and what happened to 1.044 ?
-Tomas
NOTE:
These releases fix _every_ D2 compiler segfault, stack overf
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:40:11 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
This should be a private
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:40:11 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
This should be a private release then.
If 1.045 is
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:58:32 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Christopher Wright, el 12 de mayo a las 19:14 me escribiste:
>> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>> >Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
>> >>Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
>> >>>Is there a reason for the missing announcement
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Well, traditionally (as during the last ten years), Walter has made the
announcements of new D releases. It's hardly conceivable that he'd
forget to do so, all of a sudden.
If there's no announcement, then there's
Christopher Wright, el 12 de mayo a las 19:14 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
> >>Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> >>>Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
> >>Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
And what happened to the D1 stability stance ? 1.045 is a breaking
release (both code and binary)! I don't mind, but I'm very surprised..
Which changes are you talking about here?
Stewart.
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
I think a better way to do prerele
dsimcha wrote:
So __gshared is expected to stick around as part of the spec long term?
Yes.
It's not
something that you just hacked in there for now so that, for example, druntime
would compile?
It's so users can "cowboy" quick and dirty changes to get their code to
work. It isn't allowed
Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> >Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
>
> Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
> check their builds against it.
I think a better way to do prereleases is to do a "fu
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> bearophile wrote:
> > Walter Bright:
> >> I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
> >
> > I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
> >
> > DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile the
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile them with
v1.045 the compiler prints before stopping:
Assertion failure: '0' on line 136 i
Walter Bright:
> I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile them with v1.045 the
compiler prints before stopping:
Assertion failure: '0' on line 136 in file 'statement.c
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> dsimcha wrote:
> > Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not supposed
> > to be
> > implemented yet?
> The implementation of the synchronization of shared variables is not
> done yet. It's a big step to jus
dsimcha wrote:
Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not supposed to be
implemented yet?
The implementation of the synchronization of shared variables is not
done yet. It's a big step to just make the default thread local, and to
upgrade the static type system.
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
I do apologize if I made a lot of people download a broken DMD
release, but ... Some people watch the changelog, so if you don't want
to release to be public, don't update the site!
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
>
> Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could check
> their builds against it.
>
I do apologize if I made a lot of people download
== Quote from Robert Jacques (sandf...@jhu.edu)'s article
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:50 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
> > == Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
> >> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
> >> http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
* added .typeinfo to ClassInfo
Very nice. Maybe I can go remove some hacks from my code now...
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:50 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
and what hap
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
>
> Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could check
> their builds against it.
>
I do apologize if I made a lot of people download
== Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
> http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
> and what happened to 1.044 ?
> -Tomas
Probably because it d
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Paul D. Anderson
wrote:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
>>
>> http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
>>
>> and what happened to 1.044 ?
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
> Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
>
> http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
>
> and what happened to 1.044 ?
>
> -Tomas
Walter usuallly updates the changelog pages just be
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
and what happened to 1.044 ?
-Tomas
38 matches
Mail list logo
