std2.xml and std2.encoding for D 1.0 available at D source

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Rynn
I have made a little beginning attempt at understanding the phobos xml modules. For a warm up exercise, I took the std.xml and std.encoding from phobos 2, and made them into std2.xml and std2.encoding in the DSource project std2, so the dmd 1.0 compiler took a tour tripping up all over the code.

Re: std2.xml and std2.encoding for D 1.0 available at D source

2009-08-12 Thread Saaa
> I cannot believe that anybody actually uses the std2 project files. Why do you believe this? I do.. > Ran unit tests and also successfully rab the books.xml example. Ok, so I can use this one as well, thanks! > > Re-enabled the disabled unittest in std.encoding, and fixed the little > bug that

Re: std2.xml and std2.encoding for D 1.0 available at D source

2009-08-12 Thread Bill Baxter
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael Rynn wrote: > > I have made a little beginning attempt at understanding the phobos xml > modules.  For a warm up exercise, I took the std.xml and std.encoding > from phobos 2, and made them into std2.xml and std2.encoding in the > DSource project std2, so t

Re: std2.xml and std2.encoding for D 1.0 available at D source

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Fraser
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael Rynn wrote: I took away all the safety features of const, immutable and any other things that dmd 1.0 complains about, as "recommended" for the std2. Well, different people feel differently about these things. IMO, the complication of const/immutable